Beyond Plastic: The Global Sustainable Packaging Market
報告摘要
The global packaging industry stands at a defining inflection point. Valued at more than $1 trillion, it is one of the world's largest manufacturing sectors — and one of its most scrutinised. Plastics dominate, accounting for nearly two-thirds of flexible packaging formats, yet they have become the symbol of a linear economy that consumers, regulators, and brand owners are under mounting pressure to dismantle. The decade from 2026 to 2036 will be the period in which sustainable packaging transitions from a niche commitment to a structural requirement across virtually every end-use market.
Sustainable packaging is no longer defined simply by the materials from which it is made. The leading frameworks — from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's circular economy principles to the EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation — define it as packaging designed across its entire lifecycle: from renewable or recycled feedstocks, manufactured with lower energy and carbon intensity, optimised for recyclability or compostability, and capable of re-entering biological or technical material cycles at end of life. Crucially, it must also meet the functional, food safety, and cost requirements demanded at commercial scale.
The global market for sustainable packaging materials is growing rapidly, driven by converging forces: legislative pressure in Europe, North America, and Asia; accelerating brand owner commitments to recycled content and carbon reduction targets; growing consumer willingness to pay a premium for credibly sustainable products; and a wave of material and technology innovation that is making sustainable alternatives genuinely cost-competitive with conventional plastics. Key material categories include bio-based and biodegradable polymers such as PLA, PHA, PBAT, and starch blends; paper, fibre, and moulded pulp formats; cellulose-based films; aluminium and glass for premium reusable applications; and emerging materials including mycelium composites, seaweed-based films, and protein-based bioplastics.
Barrier technology is the critical enabling layer of the sustainable packaging transition. The functional performance gap between conventional multilayer plastic laminates — which deliver outstanding oxygen, moisture, and grease resistance — and sustainable monomaterial or paper-based alternatives has historically been the primary commercial obstacle to substitution. That gap is now closing rapidly. Sustainable barrier coatings — including bio-based PVOH and EVOH, thermoplastic polymer coatings, silicone and natural wax systems, and next-generation nanocellulose and mineral coatings — are enabling paper and fibre substrates to meet the shelf-life and food safety requirements of demanding food, beverage, and pharmaceutical applications.
The transition is not without complexity. Compostable packaging faces infrastructure constraints; the contamination of conventional plastic recycling streams by bioplastics remains a live technical and regulatory challenge; chemical recycling technologies are scaling but not yet cost-parity with virgin polymer production; and the economics of bio-based feedstocks remain sensitive to agricultural commodity cycles and policy support. PFAS phase-outs across grease-resistant food packaging applications are creating both urgency and opportunity for alternative barrier solutions.
Beyond Plastic: The Global Sustainable Packaging Market 2026–2036 is a comprehensive market intelligence report providing in-depth analysis of the materials, technologies, market segments, applications, and competitive landscape shaping the global transition to sustainable packaging. Drawing on primary interviews with manufacturers and technology developers, quantitative market forecasting, lifecycle assessment data, and commercial case studies, the report equips strategic planners, investors, material scientists, packaging technologists, and brand owners with the intelligence required to navigate one of the most rapidly evolving sectors in global manufacturing.
The report is structured across six substantive chapters:
Executive Summary — Key market data, sizing, and forecasts for sustainable packaging by material type, packaging format, end-use market, and geography, including revenue and volume data from 2023 to 2036, material pricing benchmarks, leading commercial products, market trends, growth drivers, and the principal challenges facing biodegradable and compostable packaging adoption.
Introduction — A detailed framework for sustainable packaging, covering definitions, material typologies (biodegradable, compostable, bio-based, reusable, and upcycled), packaging lifecycle analysis from raw material sourcing through manufacturing, distribution, use, and end-of-life, and a structured overview of sustainable barrier coatings and packaging adhesive systems.
Sustainable Materials in Packaging — Technical deep-dives into the full spectrum of sustainable packaging materials, including conventional polymer comparisons; synthetic bio-based polymers (PLA, Bio-PET, Bio-PTT, Bio-PEF, Bio-PA, PBAT, PBS, Bio-PP); natural bio-based materials (PHA, starch blends, cellulose and nanocellulose, protein-based bioplastics, lipids and waxes, seaweed, and mycelium); sustainable barrier coatings; and sustainable adhesive technologies spanning waterborne, solvent-borne, hot melt, and radiation-curable systems.
Packaging Recycling — Analysis of the full recycling technology landscape, including mechanical recycling, advanced chemical recycling (pyrolysis, gasification, dissolution, and depolymerisation), global recycling capacities, life cycle assessments, recycling challenges for coated and multilayer materials, and the impact of adhesive systems on recyclability.
Markets and Applications — Sector-by-sector market analysis covering paper and board packaging, food packaging, flexible packaging, rigid packaging, carbon-capture-derived materials, sustainable barrier coatings markets, and packaging adhesives, with quantitative forecasts, commercial examples, and competitive dynamics for each segment.
Company Profiles — Detailed profiles of >300 companies active across the sustainable packaging value chain, from material developers and converters to technology providers and brand-led innovators.
The report profiles the following companies: 9Fiber, Acorn Pulp Group, Actega, ADBioplastics, Advanced Biochemical (Thailand), Advanced Paper Forming, Aeropowder, AGRANA Staerke, Agrosustain, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, AIM Sweden, Akorn Technology, Alberta Innovates/Innotech Materials, Alter Eco Pulp, Alterpacks, AmicaTerra, An Phát Bioplastics, Anellotech, Ankor Bioplastics, ANPOLY, Apeel Sciences, Applied Bioplastics, Aquapak Polymers, Aquaspersions, Archer Daniel Midland (ADM), Archipelago Technology Group, Archroma, Arekapak, Arkema, Arrow Greentech, Attis Innovations, Asahi Kasei Chemicals, Avantium, Avani Eco, Avient Corporation, Balrampur Chini Mills, BASF, Berry Global, Be Green Packaging, Bioelements Group, Bio Fab NZ, BIO-FED, Biofibre, Biokemik, BIOLO, BioLogiQ, BIO-LUTIONS International, Biomass Resin Holdings, Biome Bioplastics, BIOTEC, Bio2Coat, Bioform Technologies, Biovox, Bioplastech, BioSmart Nano, BlockTexx, Blue Ocean Closures, Bluepha, BOBST, Borealis, Borregaard Chemcell, Brightplus, Buhl Paperform, Business Innovation Partners, CapaTec, Carbiolice, Carbios, Cass Materials, Cardia Bioplastics, CARAPAC, Celanese, Cellugy, Cellutech (Stora Enso), Celwise, Chemol Company (Seydel), Chemkey Advanced Materials Technology, Chinova Bioworks, Cirkla, CJ Biomaterials, CKF, Coastgrass, Constantia Flexibles, Corumat, Cruz Foam, CuanTec, Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging, Daicel Polymer, Daio Paper, Danimer Scientific, DIC Corporation, DIC Products, DisSolves, DKS, Dow, DuFor Resins, DuPont, E6PR, EarthForm, Earthodic, Eastman Chemical, Ecologic Brands, Ecomann Biotechnology, Eco-Products, Eco-SQ, Ecoshell, EcoSynthetix, Ecovative Design, Ecovia Renewables and more
授權報價
| Single User | $1,200 GBP |
目錄 Table of Contents
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 37
1.1 The Global Packaging Market 37
1.2 What is sustainable packaging? 38
1.2.1 Compostable Packaging 38
1.2.2 Bioplastics Recycling Lifecycle 39
1.2.3 Commercial Examples 40
1.2.3.1 Coca-Cola and I LOHAS 40
1.2.3.2 CJ CheilJedang 40
1.2.3.3 Coca-Cola Initiatives in the Philippines 40
1.2.3.4 Listerine Wash-Off Sleeve and 30% rPET Bottle 41
1.2.3.5 TIPA Compostable Films 41
1.2.3.6 Futamura NatureFlex 42
1.2.3.7 Vegware 42
1.2.3.8 Notpla's Seaweed-Based Barrier Coating 42
1.2.3.9 Kelpi 42
1.2.3.10 PlantSea 42
1.2.3.11 Zero Circle 43
1.2.3.12 B'Zeos 43
1.2.3.13 Traceless Materials 43
1.2.3.14 Fiberpac 43
1.2.3.15 Xampla Morro 44
1.2.3.16 ReStalk 44
1.2.3.17 Releaf Paper 44
1.2.3.18 HUID 44
1.2.3.19 ReZip 45
1.2.3.20 Hipli 45
1.2.3.21 Kiud 45
1.2.3.22 L'Oréal 45
1.2.4 Waste Hierarchy 45
1.2.5 EMF Global Commitment Signatories 46
1.2.5.1 EMF Global Commitment — Targets and Progress 47
1.2.5.2 EMF Global Commitment — Achievements Against PCR Targets 48
1.3 Market Definitions and Classifications for Barrier Coatings 49
1.4 The Global Market for Sustainable Packaging 51
1.4.1 By packaging materials 51
1.4.1.1 Tonnes 51
1.4.1.2 Revenues 53
1.4.2 By packaging product type 54
1.4.2.1 Tonnes 54
1.4.2.2 Revenues 56
1.4.3 By end-use market 58
1.4.3.1 Tonnes 58
1.4.3.2 Revenues 60
1.4.4 By region 62
1.4.4.1 Tonnes 62
1.4.4.2 Revenues 64
1.5 The Global Market for Sustainable Barrier Coatings 66
1.6 Main types of Sustainable Packaging Materials 69
1.6.1 Cellulose acetate 71
1.6.2 PLA 71
1.6.3 Aliphatic-aromatic co-polyesters 71
1.6.4 PHA 71
1.6.5 Starch/starch blends 72
1.7 Prices 72
1.8 Commercial products 73
1.9 Market Trends 78
1.10 Market Drivers 79
1.10.1 Regulatory Mandates and PFAS Phase-Out Impact 82
1.10.2 Circular Economy Initiatives and Recyclability Requirements 83
1.10.3 Consumer Demand for Sustainable Packaging 84
1.10.4 E-Commerce Growth and Packaging Performance Needs 84
1.10.5 Brand Owner Sustainability Commitments 85
1.11 Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 86
1.12 End-of-Life: Recycling vs Biodegradability 87
1.13 Market Opportunities 90
1.13.1 PFAS Replacement Market Opportunity 90
1.13.2 Adjacent Market Expansion 90
1.13.3 Geographic Expansion in Emerging Markets 90
1.13.4 Value-Added Service Opportunities 90
2 INTRODUCTION 91
2.1 Market overview 91
2.2 Types of sustainable packaging materials 91
2.2.1 Biodegradable and Compostable Materials 91
2.2.1.1 PLA (Polylactic Acid) 92
2.2.1.2 Bagasse 93
2.2.1.3 Mushroom Packaging 93
2.2.1.4 Seaweed-Based Materials 94
2.2.2 Paper and Fiber-Based Materials 95
2.2.2.1 Recycled Paper/Cardboard 95
2.2.2.2 Molded Pulp 96
2.2.2.3 Bamboo Packaging 97
2.2.3 Bio-Based Plastics 97
2.2.3.1 Bio-PE and Bio-PET 97
2.2.3.2 PHAs (Polyhydroxyalkanoates) 98
2.2.4 Reusable and Upcycled Materials 98
2.2.4.1 Glass 98
2.2.4.2 Aluminium 99
2.2.4.3 Upcycled Agricultural Waste 99
2.2.5 Other Materials 100
2.2.5.1 Edible Packaging 100
2.2.5.2 Cellulose-Based Films 101
2.2.5.3 Algae-Based Materials 103
2.3 Packaging lifecycle 105
2.3.1 Raw materials 106
2.3.2 Manufacturing 106
2.3.3 Transport 107
2.3.4 Packaging in-use 108
2.3.5 End of life 108
2.4 Outlook for paper vs plastic packaging 109
3 SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS IN PACKAGING 112
3.1 Materials innovation 112
3.2 Active packaging 112
3.3 Monomaterial packaging 112
3.4 Conventional polymer materials used in packaging 113
3.4.1 Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene 114
3.4.1.1 Overview 114
3.4.1.2 Grades 114
3.4.1.3 Producers 115
3.4.2 PET and other polyester polymers 116
3.4.2.1 Overview 116
3.4.3 Renewable and bio-based polymers for packaging 116
3.4.4 Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers 117
3.4.5 Processes for bioplastics in packaging 118
3.4.6 End-of-life treatment of bio-based and sustainable packaging 119
3.5 Synthetic bio-based packaging materials 120
3.5.1 Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA) 120
3.5.1.1 Overview 120
3.5.1.2 Properties 121
3.5.1.3 Applications 121
3.5.1.4 Advantages 122
3.5.1.5 Challenges 122
3.5.1.6 Commercial examples 123
3.5.2 Polyethylene terephthalate (Bio-PET) 123
3.5.2.1 Overview 123
3.5.2.2 Properties 124
3.5.2.3 Applications 124
3.5.2.4 Advantages of Bio-PET in Packaging 125
3.5.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 125
3.5.2.6 Commercial examples 126
3.5.3 Polytrimethylene terephthalate (Bio-PTT) 126
3.5.3.1 Overview 126
3.5.3.2 Production Process 127
3.5.3.3 Properties 127
3.5.3.4 Applications 127
3.5.3.5 Advantages of Bio-PTT in Packaging 128
3.5.3.6 Challenges and Limitations 128
3.5.3.7 Commercial examples 128
3.5.4 Polyethylene furanoate (Bio-PEF) 129
3.5.4.1 Overview 129
3.5.4.2 Properties 129
3.5.4.3 Applications 129
3.5.4.4 Advantages of Bio-PEF in Packaging 130
3.5.4.5 Challenges and Limitations 130
3.5.4.6 Commercial examples 130
3.5.5 Bio-PA 131
3.5.5.1 Overview 131
3.5.5.2 Properties 131
3.5.5.3 Applications in Packaging 131
3.5.5.4 Advantages of Bio-PA in Packaging 132
3.5.5.5 Challenges and Limitations 132
3.5.5.6 Commercial examples 132
3.5.6 Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (Bio-PBAT)- Aliphatic aromatic copolyesters 133
3.5.6.1 Overview 133
3.5.6.2 Properties 133
3.5.6.3 Applications in Packaging 133
3.5.6.4 Advantages of Bio-PBAT in Packaging 134
3.5.6.5 Challenges and Limitations 134
3.5.6.6 Commercial examples 134
3.5.7 Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and copolymers 135
3.5.7.1 Overview 135
3.5.7.2 Properties 135
3.5.7.3 Applications in Packaging 135
3.5.7.4 Advantages of Bio-PBS and Co-polymers in Packaging 136
3.5.7.5 Challenges and Limitations 136
3.5.7.6 Commercial examples 136
3.5.8 Polypropylene (Bio-PP) 137
3.5.8.1 Overview 137
3.5.8.2 Properties 137
3.5.8.3 Applications in Packaging 137
3.5.8.4 Advantages of Bio-PP in Packaging 137
3.5.8.5 Challenges and Limitations 138
3.5.8.6 Commercial examples 138
3.6 Natural bio-based packaging materials 138
3.6.1 Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) 139
3.6.1.1 Properties 139
3.6.1.2 Applications in Packaging 139
3.6.1.3 Advantages of PHA in Packaging 140
3.6.1.4 Challenges and Limitations 141
3.6.1.5 Commercial examples 141
3.6.2 Starch-based blends 141
3.6.2.1 Overview 141
3.6.2.2 Properties 142
3.6.2.3 Applications in Packaging 142
3.6.2.4 Advantages of Starch-Based Blends in Packaging 142
3.6.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 143
3.6.2.6 Commercial examples 143
3.6.3 Cellulose 143
3.6.3.1 Feedstocks 143
3.6.3.1.1 Wood 144
3.6.3.1.2 Plant 144
3.6.3.1.3 Tunicate 144
3.6.3.1.4 Algae 145
3.6.3.1.5 Bacteria 145
3.6.3.2 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) 146
3.6.3.2.1 Properties 146
3.6.3.3 Nanocellulose 147
3.6.3.3.1 Cellulose nanocrystals 147
3.6.3.3.1.1 Applications in packaging 147
3.6.3.3.2 Cellulose nanofibers 148
3.6.3.3.2.1 Applications in packaging 149
3.6.3.3.3 Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC) 154
3.6.3.3.3.1 Applications in packaging 157
3.6.3.4 Commercial examples 158
3.6.4 Protein-based bioplastics in packaging 158
3.6.4.1 Feedstocks 158
3.6.4.2 Commercial examples 160
3.6.5 Lipids and waxes for packaging 160
3.6.5.1 Overview 160
3.6.5.2 Commercial examples 161
3.6.6 Seaweed-based packaging 161
3.6.6.1 Overview 161
3.6.6.2 Production 162
3.6.6.3 Applications in packaging 162
3.6.6.4 Producers 163
3.6.7 Mycelium 163
3.6.7.1 Overview 163
3.6.7.2 Applications in packaging 164
3.6.7.3 Commercial examples 165
3.6.8 Chitosan 165
3.6.8.1 Overview 165
3.6.8.2 Applications in packaging 166
3.6.8.3 Commercial examples 166
3.6.9 Bio-naphtha 167
3.6.9.1 Overview 167
3.6.9.2 Markets and applications 168
3.6.9.3 Commercial examples 170
3.7 Sustainable Barrier Coatings 171
3.7.1 Substrates: Paper and Plastic 171
3.7.1.1 Paper substrate characteristics and coating requirements 171
3.7.1.2 Plastic substrate applications and sustainability challenges 171
3.7.1.3 Substrate selection criteria and performance trade-offs 172
3.7.2 Extrusion Barrier Coatings 173
3.7.3 Thermoplastic Polymers 174
3.7.4 Aluminium 174
3.7.5 Waxes 175
3.7.6 Silicone and Other Natural Materials 176
3.7.7 High Barrier Polymers 176
3.7.8 Wet-Barrier Coatings 177
3.7.8.1 Application methods and process optimization 177
3.7.8.2 Performance benchmarking against alternatives 178
3.7.8.3 Environmental impact assessment 178
3.7.8.4 Market adoption patterns 179
3.7.9 Wax Coating 179
3.7.10 Barrier Metallisation 183
3.7.10.1 Technology overview and application scope 183
3.7.10.2 Performance advantages in barrier applications 183
3.7.10.3 Sustainability challenges and recycling impact 184
3.7.11 Biodegradable, biobased and recyclable coatings 184
3.7.12 Monolayer Coatings 189
3.7.13 Current Technology State-of-the-Art 189
3.7.13.1 Water-based coating technologies 189
3.7.13.2 Bio-based polymer solutions 191
3.7.13.2.1 Polysaccharides 193
3.7.13.2.1.1 Chitin 194
3.7.13.2.1.2 Chitosan 194
3.7.13.2.1.3 Starch 194
3.7.13.2.2 Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) 194
3.7.13.2.3 Poly(butylene Succinate 195
3.7.13.2.4 Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) 196
3.7.13.2.5 Alginate 197
3.7.13.2.6 Cellulose Acetate 197
3.7.13.2.7 Protein-Based (Soy, Wheat) 198
3.7.13.2.8 Bio-PE (Polyethylene) 199
3.7.13.2.9 Bio-PET 199
3.7.13.2.10 Lignin-Based Polymers 200
3.7.13.2.11 Bacterial Cellulose 200
3.7.13.2.12 Furan-Based Polymers (PEF) 201
3.7.13.2.13 Tannin-Based Polymers 202
3.7.14 Rosins 202
3.7.14.1 Dispersion Coating Systems 203
3.7.14.2 Nano-enhanced Barrier Materials 205
3.7.15 Global Bioplastics Production Capacity 207
3.8 Sustainable Packaging Adhesives 210
3.8.1 Waterborne adhesives 210
3.8.1.1 Acrylic-copolymer adhesives 211
3.8.1.2 VAE (vinyl acetate ethylene) adhesives 211
3.8.1.3 PVAc (polyvinyl acetate) adhesives 212
3.8.1.4 Natural-based adhesives 213
3.8.2 Solvent-borne/reactive systems 213
3.8.2.1 Acrylic adhesives 214
3.8.2.2 Synthetic elastomer adhesives 214
3.8.2.3 Polyurethane adhesives 215
3.8.3 Hot melt adhesives 216
3.8.3.1 EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) hot melts 216
3.8.3.2 Polyolefin hot melts 217
3.8.3.3 Bio-based hot melts 218
3.8.3.4 Polyamide hot melts 218
3.8.4 Radiation-curable adhesives 219
3.8.4.1 UV-curable systems 219
3.8.4.2 Electron beam curable adhesives 220
4 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT AND COMPLIANCE 221
4.1 PFAS Restrictions and Phase-Out Schedules 221
4.2 Single-Use Plastics Directive 223
4.3 Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) 224
4.4 REACH and Chemical Safety Requirements 225
4.5 Food Contact Regulations and Safety Requirements 226
4.6 Extended Producer Responsibility Schemes 227
4.7 EU Member State Circular Economy Action Plans 228
4.8 On-Pack Labelling, Digital Product Passports, and Information Requirements 229
4.9 North American Regulatory Environment 230
4.10 Asia-Pacific Regulatory Development 231
4.11 Emerging Market Regulatory Development 232
4.12 Compliance Strategies: Industry Consortiums, Collaborative Frameworks, and Certification 233
5 PACKAGING RECYCLING 236
5.1 Mechanical recycling 238
5.1.1 Closed-loop mechanical recycling 238
5.1.2 Open-loop mechanical recycling 238
5.1.3 Polymer types, use, and recovery 239
5.2 Advanced chemical recycling 239
5.2.1 Main streams of plastic waste 240
5.2.2 Comparison of mechanical and advanced chemical recycling 241
5.3 Capacities 241
5.4 Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by recycling technology 242
5.5 Global market by recycling process 2020-2024, metric tons 244
5.6 Chemically recycled plastic products 245
5.7 Market map 246
5.8 Value chain 247
5.9 Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of advanced plastics recycling processes 247
5.10 Pyrolysis 248
5.10.1 Non-catalytic 249
5.10.2 Catalytic 250
5.10.2.1 Polystyrene pyrolysis 252
5.10.2.2 Pyrolysis for production of bio fuel 252
5.10.2.3 Used tires pyrolysis 255
5.10.2.3.1 Conversion to biofuel 256
5.10.2.4 Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes 257
5.10.3 SWOT analysis 258
5.10.4 Companies and capacities 258
5.11 Gasification 261
5.11.1 Technology overview 261
5.11.1.1 Syngas conversion to methanol 262
5.11.1.2 Biomass gasification and syngas fermentation 265
5.11.1.3 Biomass gasification and syngas thermochemical conversion 265
5.11.2 SWOT analysis 265
5.11.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 266
5.12 Dissolution 267
5.12.1 Technology overview 267
5.12.2 SWOT analysis 268
5.12.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 269
5.13 Depolymerisation 270
5.13.1 Hydrolysis 272
5.13.1.1 Technology overview 272
5.13.1.2 SWOT analysis 273
5.13.2 Enzymolysis 274
5.13.2.1 Technology overview 274
5.13.2.2 SWOT analysis 274
5.13.3 Methanolysis 275
5.13.3.1 Technology overview 275
5.13.3.2 SWOT analysis 276
5.13.4 Glycolysis 276
5.13.4.1 Technology overview 276
5.13.4.2 SWOT analysis 278
5.13.5 Aminolysis 278
5.13.5.1 Technology overview 278
5.13.5.2 SWOT analysis 279
5.13.6 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 279
5.14 Other advanced chemical recycling technologies 281
5.14.1 Hydrothermal cracking 281
5.14.2 Pyrolysis with in-line reforming 282
5.14.3 Microwave-assisted pyrolysis 283
5.14.4 Plasma pyrolysis 283
5.14.5 Plasma gasification 284
5.14.6 Supercritical fluids 284
5.15 Recycling challenges for coated materials 285
5.15.1 Material recovery facility (MRF) challenges 285
5.15.2 AI and optical sorting technologies 285
5.15.3 Recycling by design principles 286
5.15.4 Mono-material coating approaches 286
5.16 Adhesive Impact on Recyclability 289
5.16.1 Debonding technologies 289
5.16.2 Water-washable adhesive systems 289
5.16.3 Adhesive contamination in recycling streams 289
5.16.4 Design for recycling guidelines 289
6 MARKETS AND APPLICATIONS 290
6.1 PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING 290
6.1.1 Market overview 290
6.1.2 Recycled Paper and Cardboard 290
6.1.2.1 Post-consumer recycled (PCR) content paperboard 290
6.1.2.2 Kraft paper made from recycled fibers 291
6.1.2.3 Corrugated cardboard with high recycled content 291
6.1.3 FSC/PEFC Certified Virgin Fibers 292
6.1.3.1 Sustainably managed forest sources 292
6.1.3.2 Chain-of-custody certified materials 294
6.1.4 Alternative Fiber Sources 295
6.1.4.1 Bamboo-based paper and board 295
6.1.4.2 Agricultural waste fibers (wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse) 296
6.1.4.3 Hemp and flax fiber papers 296
6.1.5 Plastic-Free Barrier Papers 297
6.1.5.1 Clay-coated papers 298
6.1.5.2 Silicone-coated papers 299
6.1.5.3 Mineral oil barrier papers 299
6.1.6 Water-Based Coatings and Adhesives 300
6.1.6.1 Replacing plastic laminations with aqueous coatings 300
6.1.6.2 Plant-based adhesives for box construction 301
6.1.7 Global market size and forecast to 2036 302
6.1.7.1 Tonnes 302
6.1.7.2 Revenues 303
6.2 FOOD PACKAGING 305
6.2.1 Films and trays 306
6.2.2 Pouches and bags 306
6.2.3 Textiles and nets 306
6.2.4 Compostable Food Containers 307
6.2.4.1 PLA (polylactic acid) trays and containers 307
6.2.4.2 Bagasse food service items 307
6.2.4.3 Molded fiber clamshells and trays 308
6.2.5 Biodegradable Films and Wraps 308
6.2.5.1 Cellulose-based films 308
6.2.5.2 PLA films for food wrapping 308
6.2.5.3 Starch-based wraps 309
6.2.6 Bio-Based Barrier Materials 309
6.2.6.1 Paper with biopolymer coatings 309
6.2.6.2 Plant-based waxes for moisture resistance 310
6.2.6.3 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) coatings 310
6.2.7 Reusable Food Packaging Systems 310
6.2.7.1 Returnable Glass Containers 310
6.2.7.2 Durable Bioplastic Containers 311
6.2.7.3 Loop-Style Reuse Systems 311
6.2.8 Bioadhesives 312
6.2.8.1 Starch 312
6.2.8.2 Cellulose 312
6.2.8.3 Protein-Based 313
6.2.9 Barrier coatings and films 313
6.2.9.1 Polysaccharides 314
6.2.9.1.1 Chitin 314
6.2.9.1.2 Chitosan 314
6.2.9.1.3 Starch 314
6.2.9.2 Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) 315
6.2.9.3 Poly(butylene Succinate) 315
6.2.9.4 Functional Lipid and Proteins Based Coatings 315
6.2.10 Active and Smart Food Packaging 315
6.2.10.1 Active Materials and Packaging Systems 315
6.2.10.2 Intelligent and Smart Food Packaging 316
6.2.10.3 Oxygen scavengers from natural materials 318
6.2.10.4 Antimicrobial packaging from plant extracts 319
6.2.10.5 Bio-based sensors for food freshness 320
6.2.11 Antimicrobial films and agents 322
6.2.11.1 Natural 323
6.2.11.2 Inorganic nanoparticles 323
6.2.11.3 Biopolymers 323
6.2.12 Bio-based Inks and Dyes 324
6.2.13 Edible films and coatings 324
6.2.13.1 Overview 324
6.2.13.2 Commercial examples 326
6.2.14 Global market size and forecast to 2036 327
6.2.14.1 Tonnes 327
6.2.14.2 Revenues 328
6.3 FLEXIBLE PACKAGING 331
6.3.1 Market overview 331
6.3.2 Compostable Flexible Films 331
6.3.2.1 PLA film laminates 331
6.3.2.2 PHAs (polyhydroxyalkanoates) films 332
6.3.2.3 PBAT (polybutylene adipate terephthalate) films 333
6.3.2.4 TPS (thermoplastic starch) films 334
6.3.3 Recyclable Mono-Materials 337
6.3.3.1 All-PE (polyethylene) structures 337
6.3.3.2 All-PP (polypropylene) structures 338
6.3.3.3 Designed for mechanical recycling 339
6.3.4 Paper-Based Flexible Packaging 340
6.3.4.1 High-strength paper with functional coatings 340
6.3.4.2 Paper-plastic hybrid structures with separable layers 341
6.3.4.3 Glassine and greaseproof papers 342
6.3.5 Bio-Based Films 343
6.3.5.1 Bio-PE films (from sugarcane) 343
6.3.5.2 Bio-PET films 344
6.3.5.3 Cellulose-based transparent films 345
6.3.6 Reduced Material Structures 346
6.3.6.1 Ultra-thin films with enhanced performance 346
6.3.6.2 Downgauged materials with reinforcing technologies 347
6.3.6.3 Resource-efficient multi-layer structures 348
6.3.7 Global market size and forecast to 2036 349
6.3.7.1 Tonnes 349
6.3.7.2 Revenues 351
6.4 RIGID PACKAGING 354
6.4.1 Market overview 354
6.4.2 Recycled Plastic Containers 354
6.4.2.1 rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate) bottles and containers 354
6.4.2.2 rHDPE (recycled high-density polyethylene) bottles 355
6.4.2.3 PCR polypropylene tubs and containers 356
6.4.3 Bio-Based Rigid Plastics 357
6.4.3.1 Bio-PET bottles (partially plant-based) 357
6.4.3.2 Bio-PE containers 358
6.4.3.3 PLA bottles and jars 359
6.4.4 Refillable/Reusable Systems 360
6.4.4.1 Durable containers designed for multiple uses 360
6.4.4.2 Standardized shapes for refill systems 360
6.4.4.3 Concentrated product formats reducing packaging 361
6.4.5 Alternative Materials 362
6.4.5.1 Mushroom packaging for protective applications 362
6.4.5.2 Molded pulp containers and inserts 363
6.4.5.3 Wood and cork containers for premium products 363
6.4.6 Glass and Metal Alternatives 364
6.4.6.1 Lightweight glass technologies 364
6.4.6.2 Thin-walled aluminum containers 364
6.4.6.3 Tin-free steel packaging 365
6.4.7 Global market and forecasts to 2036 365
6.4.7.1 Tonnes 365
6.4.7.2 Revenues 367
6.5 CARBON CAPTURE DERIVED MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING 370
6.5.1 Benefits of carbon utilization for plastics feedstocks 370
6.5.2 CO₂-derived polymers and plastics 372
6.5.3 CO2 utilization products 373
6.6 SUSTAINABLE BARRIER COATINGS 375
6.6.1 Market overview and drivers 375
6.6.2 Coating consumption by substrate type 375
6.6.2.1 Paper substrates 375
6.6.2.2 Plastic substrates 376
6.6.3 Market by coating process 377
6.6.3.1 Extrusion coatings 377
6.6.3.2 Wet-coating applications 379
6.6.3.3 Wax coating processes 380
6.6.4 Market by material type 381
6.6.4.1 Thermoplastic polymer coatings 381
6.6.4.1.1 Polyethylene-based coatings 381
6.6.4.1.2 Polypropylene-based coatings 382
6.6.4.1.3 Bio-PE coating applications 383
6.6.4.2 High barrier polymer coatings 385
6.6.4.2.1 Green PVOH (polyvinyl alcohol) coatings 385
6.6.4.2.2 EVOH (ethylene vinyl alcohol) coatings 386
6.6.4.2.3 Barrier performance characteristics 387
6.6.4.3 Aluminium barrier coatings 388
6.6.4.3.1 Vacuum metallization processes 389
6.6.4.3.2 Aluminium deposition techniques 389
6.6.4.3.3 Recyclability considerations 390
6.6.4.4 Wax coatings 391
6.6.4.4.1 Natural wax applications 392
6.6.4.4.2 Synthetic wax alternatives 392
6.6.4.4.3 Biodegradability characteristics 393
6.6.4.5 Silicone and natural material coatings 395
6.6.4.5.1 Silicone oxide coatings 395
6.6.4.5.2 Natural polymer coatings 396
6.6.4.5.3 Seaweed-based barrier coatings 397
6.6.4.6 Biobased barrier polymers 398
6.6.4.6.1 PHA coating applications 398
6.6.4.6.2 Starch-based barrier coatings 399
6.6.4.6.3 Protein-based barrier materials 400
6.7 SUSTAINABLE ACTIVE AND INTELLIGENT PACKAGING 401
6.7.1 Introduction and Market Overview 401
6.7.2 Classification of Active Packaging Systems 403
6.7.3 Bio-Based Oxygen Scavengers 403
6.7.4 Antimicrobial Packaging from Natural Agents 404
6.7.5 Ethylene Scavengers for Fresh Produce 406
6.7.6 Moisture Management Systems 407
6.7.7 Intelligent and Smart Packaging Systems 407
6.7.8 Edible Films and Coatings as Active Packaging 409
6.7.9 Regulatory Framework for Active and Intelligent Packaging 411
6.7.10 Market Forecast: Sustainable Active and Intelligent Packaging, 2023–2036 411
6.7.11 Key Technology Developers and Commercial Examples 413
6.8 PACKAGING BIOADHESIVES 414
6.8.1 Market Overview and Structure 414
6.8.1.1 Industry Structure Analysis 414
6.8.2 Value Chain Mapping 415
6.8.3 Competitive Landscape 416
6.8.4 Market Drivers and External Factors 418
6.8.4.1 Economic Trends Impact 418
6.8.4.2 Global Trade Tensions Effects 418
6.8.4.3 Population Growth Influence 418
6.8.4.4 E-Commerce Growth Drivers 419
6.8.4.5 Raw Material Costs and Availability 419
6.8.5 Regulatory Influences 420
6.8.6 Packaging Waste and Regulations 421
6.8.6.1 Extended Producer Responsibility Impact 421
6.8.6.2 EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation 421
6.8.6.3 Adhesive Raw Material Regulations 422
6.8.6.4 Food Packaging Adhesive Requirements 422
6.8.7 Market by Adhesive Type 423
6.8.7.1 Waterborne Adhesives Market 423
6.8.7.1.1 Acrylic-Copolymer Adhesives 423
6.8.7.1.2 VAE Adhesives 424
6.8.7.1.3 PVAc Adhesives 425
6.8.7.1.4 Natural-Based Adhesives 425
6.8.7.2 Solvent-Borne and Reactive Systems Market 426
6.8.7.2.1 Acrylic Systems 427
6.8.7.2.2 Synthetic Elastomer Systems 427
6.8.7.2.3 Polyurethane Systems 427
6.8.7.3 Hot Melt Adhesives Market 428
6.8.7.3.1 EVA Hot Melts 428
6.8.7.3.2 Polyolefin Hot Melts 428
6.8.7.3.3 Synthetic Elastomer Hot Melts 429
6.8.7.3.4 Bio-Based Hot Melt Developments 429
6.8.7.4 Radiation-Curable Adhesives 430
6.8.8 Market by Packaging Type 431
6.8.8.1 Rigid Packaging and Labels 431
6.8.8.1.1 Corrugated Board Packaging 431
6.8.8.1.2 Paperboard Applications 432
6.8.8.1.3 Carton Assembly 432
6.8.8.1.4 Core Manufacturing 433
6.8.8.1.5 §Composite Cans and Containers 433
6.8.8.1.6 Rigid Plastic Containers 433
6.8.8.1.7 Labels and Lidding 433
6.8.8.1.8 Flexible Packaging 434
6.8.8.1.9 Multilayer Structure Lamination 434
6.8.8.1.10 Seal Layer Applications 435
6.8.8.1.11 Adhesive Lamination Processes 435
6.8.8.1.12 Heat Sealing Applications 435
6.8.9 Market by End-Use Applications 436
6.8.9.1 Food Packaging Applications 436
6.8.9.1.1 Fresh and Processed Meat, Poultry, and Fish 437
6.8.9.1.2 Fresh Fruit and Vegetables 437
6.8.9.1.3 Frozen and Chilled Food 437
6.8.9.1.4 Ready Meals 438
6.8.9.1.5 Additional Food Applications 438
6.8.9.2 Beverage Packaging 439
6.8.9.2.1 Bottled Water 439
6.8.9.2.2 Carbonated Soft Drinks 439
6.8.9.2.3 Fruit Juice and Juice Drinks 440
6.8.9.2.4 Hot Beverages and Other Soft Drinks 440
6.8.9.2.5 Alcoholic Drinks 440
6.8.9.3 Non-Food Packaging 440
6.8.9.3.1 Cosmetics and Personal Care 441
6.8.9.3.2 Household Products 441
6.8.9.3.3 Healthcare Products 441
6.8.9.3.4 Industrial Products 441
7 COMPANY PROFILES 443 (331 company profiles)
8 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 714
9 REFERENCES 715
圖表清單 List of Tables & Figures
List of Tables
Table 1. Compostable Packaging — Key Target Applications and Certification Requirements 38
Table 2. TIPA Compostable Films — End-Use Application Examples 41
Table 3. Waste Hierarchy — Definition, Packaging Examples, and Regulatory Priority 46
Table 4. EMF Global Commitment — Signatory Breakdown by Organisation Type (2024) 47
Table 5. EMF Global Commitment — Core Targets and Reported Progress (2024) 47
Table 6. EMF Global Commitment — Reported PCR Content Achievements by Material and Sector (2024) 48
Table 7. Sustainable Barrier Coatings Taxonomy. 49
Table 8. Performance Criteria and Sustainability Metrics for Barrier Coatings. 50
Table 9. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Materials, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 51
Table 10. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Materials, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 53
Table 11. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Product Type, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 55
Table 12. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Product Type, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 57
Table 13. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by End-Use Market, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 59
Table 14. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by End-Use Market, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 61
Table 15. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Region, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 63
Table 16. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Region, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 64
Table 17. Global Sustainable Barrier Coatings Market Size and Forecast, 2019–2036. 66
Table 18. Sustainable Barrier Coatings Market Size by Region, 2025–2036 ('000 tonnes and $ million). 67
Table 19. Sustainable Barrier Coatings Market Size by Application, 2025–2036 ('000 tonnes and $ million). 67
Table 20. Cost Structure Analysis by Barrier Coating Type. 68
Table 21. Global Sustainable Barrier Coating Consumption by Material Type, 2019–2036 ('000 tonnes). 68
Table 22. Global Value of Sustainable Barrier Coatings by Material Type, 2019–2036 ($ million). 69
Table 23. Main Types of Sustainable Packaging Materials 69
Table 24. Average prices by packaging type, 2024 (US$ per kg). 72
Table 25. Average annual prices by bioplastic type, 2020-2023 (US$ per kg). 73
Table 26. Recent sustainable packaging products. 74
Table 27. Market trends in Sustainable Packaging 78
Table 28. Sustainable Packaging Trends to 2036. 79
Table 29. Market drivers for recent growth in the Sustainable Packaging market. 80
Table 30. Key Market Drivers and Impact Assessment. 81
Table 31. Market Drivers Impact Assessment Matrix. 81
Table 32. Regulatory Compliance Standards for Sustainable Packaging and Barrier Coatings. 82
Table 33. PFAS Phase-Out Timeline and Replacement Market Opportunity by Region. 83
Table 34. Circular Economy Initiatives and Recyclability Requirements. 83
Table 35. E-Commerce Packaging Performance Requirements. 84
Table 36. Major Brand Owner Sustainability Commitments — Packaging Implications. 85
Table 37. Sustainable Packaging Market Challenges and Restraints. 86
Table 38. Circular Economy Principles in Coating Design. 87
Table 39. Biodegradability Standards and Certification Requirements. 88
Table 40. Forecasts for Global Circularity Rates by Packaging Material, 2023–2036. 89
Table 41. Economic Analysis of End-of-Life Options (costs and revenues per tonne processed). 89
Table 42. Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging Materials 91
Table 43. Seaweed-Based Packaging Materials — Technical and Commercial Overview 94
Table 44. Moulded Pulp Packaging — Grade Comparison and Applications 96
Table 45. Edible Packaging Systems — Materials, Properties, and Applications 101
Table 46. Cellulose-Based Film Grades — Properties and Applications 102
Table 47. Algae-Based Packaging Materials — Technology Landscape 104
Table 48. Paper vs Plastic Packaging — Comparative Lifecycle Performance 110
Table 49. Types of bio-based plastics and fossil-fuel-based plastics 113
Table 50. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers. 117
Table 51. Processes for bioplastics in packaging. 119
Table 52. LDPE film versus PLA, 2019–24 (USD/tonne). 120
Table 53. PLA properties for packaging applications. 121
Table 54. Applications, advantages and disadvantages of PHAs in packaging. 140
Table 55. Major polymers found in the extracellular covering of different algae. 145
Table 56. Market overview for cellulose microfibers (microfibrillated cellulose) in paperboard and packaging-market age, key benefits, applications and producers. 146
Table 57. Applications of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC). 148
Table 58. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in packaging. 149
Table 59. Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose in Packaging. 157
Table 60. Types of protein based-bioplastics, applications and companies. 159
Table 61. Overview of alginate-description, properties, application and market size. 161
Table 62. Companies developing algal-based bioplastics. 163
Table 63. Overview of mycelium fibers-description, properties, drawbacks and applications. 163
Table 64. Overview of chitosan-description, properties, drawbacks and applications. 165
Table 65. Commercial Examples of Chitosan-based Films and Coatings and Companies. 166
Table 66. Bio-based naphtha markets and applications. 168
Table 67. Bio-naphtha market value chain. 169
Table 68. Commercial Examples of Bio-Naphtha Packaging and Companies. 170
Table 69. Paper substrate characteristics and coating requirements. 171
Table 70. Plastic substrate applications and sustainability challenges. 172
Table 71. Substrate selection criteria and performance trade-offs. 172
Table 72. Wet-Barrier Coatings Application methods and process optimization. 177
Table 73. Wet-Barrier Coatings Performance benchmarking against alternatives. 178
Table 74.Wet-Barrier Coatings Environmental Impact Assessment 178
Table 75. Wax Coating Sustainability Credentials and Limitations. 180
Table 76. Wax Coating Sustainability credentials and limitations. 181
Table 77. Types of biobased coatings materials. 187
Table 78. Water-based coating technologies. 190
Table 79. Global bioplastics capacities by Material Type ('000 tonnes). 191
Table 80. Bio-based polymer solutions. 193
Table 81. Dispersion coating systems. 204
Table 82. Nano-enhanced barrier materials. 205
Table 83. Global Bioplastics Capacities by Material Type, 2024 ('000 tonnes). 207
Table 84. Bio-Based Polymer Solutions: Barrier Performance and Commercial Readiness. 208
Table 85. Applications of Barrier Nanocoatings in Packaging Sectors. 209
Table 86. Waterborne Packaging Adhesive Market by Chemistry, 2025 (Millions USD) 210
Table 87. PFAS Restrictions and Phase-Out Schedules. 222
Table 88. PFAS Ban Impact by Region and Timeline. 222
Table 89. Single-Use Plastics Directive: Scope, EPR Fees and Exemption Criteria for Qualifying Sustainable Materials. 223
Table 90. PPWR Implementation Timeline and Coating-Relevant Compliance Obligations. 224
Table 91. REACH Regulation: Key Requirements Affecting Barrier Coating Development. 225
Table 92. International Food Contact Regulations and Safety Requirements. 226
Table 93. FDA Food Contact Regulatory Pathways. 227
Table 94. Extended Producer Responsibility Schemes: Global Overview. 228
Table 95. EU Member State Circular Economy Action Plans. 229
Table 96. US State-Level PFAS Bans and Restrictions in Packaging. 230
Table 97. North American Environmental Protection Initiatives Relevant to Sustainable Packaging. 231
Table 98. Asia-Pacific Regulatory Development: Sustainable Packaging Frameworks. 232
Table 99. Emerging Market Regulatory Development Trends. 232
Table 100. Industry Consortium Initiatives. 233
Table 101. Collaborative Compliance Framework Models. 234
Table 102. Certification and Testing Protocols for Sustainable Packaging Materials and Coatings. 234
Table 103. Overview of the recycling technologies. 237
Table 104. Polymer Types, Use, and Mechanical Recycling Recovery Rates. 239
Table 105. Composition of Plastic Waste Streams and Chemical Recycling Applicability. 240
Table 106. Comparison of Mechanical and Advanced Chemical Recycling. 241
Table 107. Advanced Plastics Recycling Capacities by Technology and Company. 241
Table 108. Example chemically recycled plastic products. 245
Table 109. Life Cycle Assessments of Advanced Chemical Recycling Processes. 247
Table 110. Summary of Non-Catalytic Pyrolysis Technologies. 249
Table 111. Summary of catalytic pyrolysis technologies. 250
Table 112. Summary of pyrolysis technique under different operating conditions. 253
Table 113. Biomass materials and their bio-oil yield. 254
Table 114. Biofuel production cost from the biomass pyrolysis process. 255
Table 115. Pyrolysis Companies and Plant Capacities, Current and Planned (2026) 259
Table 116. Gasification Technology Developers and Capacities. 261
Table 117. Summary of gasification technologies. 261
Table 118. Advanced recycling (Gasification) companies. 266
Table 119. Summary of dissolution technologies. 267
Table 120. Advanced recycling (Dissolution) companies 269
Table 121. Depolymerisation processes for PET, PU, PC and PA, products and yields. 271
Table 122. Summary of hydrolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 272
Table 123. Summary of Enzymolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 274
Table 124. Summary of methanolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 275
Table 125. Summary of glycolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 277
Table 126. Summary of aminolysis technologies. 278
Table 127. Advanced recycling (Depolymerisation) companies and capacities (current and planned). 279
Table 128. Overview of hydrothermal cracking for advanced chemical recycling. 281
Table 129. Overview of Pyrolysis with in-line reforming for advanced chemical recycling. 282
Table 130. Overview of microwave-assisted pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 283
Table 131. Overview of plasma pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 283
Table 132. Overview of plasma gasification for advanced chemical recycling. 284
Table 133. Mono-Material Coating Approaches for Recyclability. 286
Table 134. Mono-material coating approaches. 287
Table 135. Major Forest Certification Schemes — Comparative Overview 293
Table 136. Chain-of-Custody Certification — Key Standards and Requirements 294
Table 137.Global Market for Sustainable Paper and Board Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 ('000 tonnes). 302
Table 138. The Global Market for Sustainable Paper and Board Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 303
Table 139. Pros and Cons of Different Food Packaging Material Types. 306
Table 140.Bioplastics Properties vs Conventional Polymers for Flexible Food Packaging. 316
Table 141. Active Biodegradable Films films and their food applications. 317
Table 142. Intelligent Biodegradable Films. 317
Table 143. Bio-Based Oxygen Scavenger Technologies — Performance, Activation, and Commercial Status 318
Table 144. Natural Antimicrobial Agents in Active Packaging — Efficacy, Spectrum, and Regulatory Status 320
Table 145. Bio-Based Freshness Sensor Technologies — Active Agent, Target Analyte, and Application 321
Table 146. Edible films and coatings market summary. 324
Table 147. The Global Market for Sustainable Food Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (’000 tonnes) 327
Table 148. The Global Market for Sustainable Food Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 329
Table 149. Typical Applications for Bioplastics in Flexible Packaging. 331
Table 150. PHA Film Grades — Properties and Commercial Comparison 332
Table 151. PBAT Film Key Properties vs. Comparable Flexible Film Materials 333
Table 152. TPS Film Properties by Formulation Type 335
Table 153. Comparison of bioplastics’ (PLA and PHAs) properties to other common polymers used in product packaging. 335
Table 154. Typical applications for bioplastics in flexible packaging. 336
Table 155. All-PP Monomaterial Structure Types — Barrier Performance and Recycling Compatibility 339
Table 156. Design-for-Recycling Criteria for Flexible Packaging — Key Parameters 340
Table 157. High-Strength Paper Barrier Coating Systems — Performance and Recyclability 340
Table 158. Paper-Plastic Hybrid Separable Structures — Separation Mechanism and Recyclability 342
Table 159. Glassine and Greaseproof Paper Grades — Properties and Applications 343
Table 160. Bio-PE Film Grades — Properties vs. Fossil PE 344
Table 161. Bio-PET and PEF Film Properties vs. Fossil PET 344
Table 162. Cellulose Film Grades — Barrier Performance and Applications 345
Table 163. Ultra-Thin Barrier Coating Technologies — Thickness, Performance, and Recyclability 346
Table 164. Downgauging Technologies — Gauge Reduction Potential and Performance Impact 347
Table 165. Conventional vs. Resource-Efficient Multi-Layer Flexible Structures 348
Table 166. The Global Market for Sustainable Flexible Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (’000 tonnes) 349
Table 167. The Global Market for Sustainable Flexible Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 351
Table 168. rPET Mechanical Recycling Grades — Quality, Applications, and Price Benchmarks 355
Table 169. rHDPE Grades — Quality Characteristics, Food Contact Status, and Applications 356
Table 170. PCR Polypropylene Supply Constraints and Commercial Applications 357
Table 171. Bio-PET Bottle — Commercial Grades, Bio-Content, and Performance vs. Fossil PET 358
Table 172. Bio-PE Rigid Container Grades — Properties, Applications, and Commercial Status 359
Table 173. Typical applications for bioplastics in rigid packaging. 359
Table 174. Standardized Refill Container Systems — Commercial Examples and Performance 361
Table 175. Mycelium Composite Packaging — Properties vs. Conventional Protective Packaging 362
Table 176. Moulded Pulp Grades — Properties, Applications, and Leading Producers 363
Table 177. The Global Market for Sustainable Rigid Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (’000 tonnes) 366
Table 178. The Global Market for Sustainable Rigid Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 367
Table 179. CO2 utilization and removal pathways. 371
Table 180. CO2 utilization products developed by chemical and plastic producers. 373
Table 181. Sustainable Barrier Coating Technologies for Paper Substrates — Performance and Recyclability 376
Table 182. Sustainable Barrier Coatings on Plastic Film Substrates — Performance and Recycling Compatibility 377
Table 183. Extrusion Coating Materials for Sustainable Packaging — Process Parameters and Performance 378
Table 184. Wet-Coating Process Technologies — Speed, Coat Weight, and Application Suitability 379
Table 185. Wax Coating Types — Sustainability Profile, Barrier Performance, and Recyclability 380
Table 186. Polyethylene Coating Grades — Properties, Sustainability, and Application Range 382
Table 187. Polypropylene Coating Grades — Application Parameters and Sustainability Profile 383
Table 188. Bio-PE Coating Applications — Deployment Examples and Performance vs. Fossil PE 384
Table 189. PVOH Coating Grades — Performance Characteristics and Recyclability 385
Table 190. EVOH Grade Specifications — Barrier Performance and Humidity Dependence 386
Table 191. Sustainable Barrier Coating Technologies — Comprehensive Performance Comparison 387
Table 192. Aluminium and Ceramic Deposition Techniques — Barrier Performance Comparison 390
Table 193. Aluminium Barrier Coating Recyclability — Thickness Thresholds and Stream Compatibility 391
Table 194. Natural Wax Types for Packaging — Properties, Applications, and Sustainability 392
Table 195. Synthetic Wax Coating Types — Performance, Processability, and Recyclability 393
Table 196. Wax Coating Biodegradability — Environmental Profiles 394
Table 197. Silicon Oxide Coating Technologies — Performance and Applications 395
Table 198. Natural Polymer Coatings — Barrier Properties and Sustainability Profile 396
Table 199. Seaweed-Based Barrier Coatings — Polysaccharide Types and Performance 397
Table 200. PHA Barrier Coating Grades — Properties and Application Performance 399
Table 201. Protein-Based Barrier Coating Materials — Performance and Commercial Status 400
Table 202. Global Active and Intelligent Packaging Market by Technology Type, 2025 and 2036 (Millions USD) 401
Table 203. Global Sustainable Active and Intelligent Packaging Market by Application Sector, 2025–2036 (Millions USD) 402
Table 204. Bio-Based Oxygen Scavenger Technologies — Performance and Commercial Status 404
Table 205. Natural Antimicrobial Agents in Active Packaging — Efficacy and Regulatory Status 405
Table 206. Intelligent and Smart Packaging Technologies — Bio-Based and Sustainable Systems 409
Table 207. Edible Film and Coating Systems — Biopolymer Substrates and Active Compound Combinations 410
Table 208. Global Sustainable Active and Intelligent Packaging Market by Technology Type, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 411
Table 209. Global Sustainable Active and Intelligent Packaging Market by Region, 2025–2036 (Millions USD) 413
Table 210. Global Packaging Adhesive Market Structure, 2025 414
Table 211. Global Packaging Adhesive Market by Technology Family, 2025 and 2036 (Millions USD) 415
Table 212. Packaging Adhesive Value Chain — Key Players by Stage 416
Table 213. Leading Packaging Adhesive Suppliers — Sustainability Portfolio Assessment, 2025 417
Table 214. Key Packaging Adhesive Raw Materials — Cost, Source, and Bio-Based Alternatives 419
Table 215. EPR Eco-Modulation Impact on Packaging Adhesive Specification — Selected Markets 421
Table 216. Food Packaging Adhesive Compliance Requirements — EU Framework 423
Table 217. Acrylic PSA Performance Specifications by Application 424
Table 218. Natural-Based Adhesive Systems — Properties and Packaging Applications 426
Table 219. Bio-Based Hot Melt Adhesive Development Landscape 430
Table 220. Corrugated Board Adhesive System Specifications 431
Table 221. Flexible Packaging Adhesive System — Application Performance Requirements 434
Table 222. Packaging Adhesive Market by Food Application Segment, 2025 (Millions USD) 436
Table 223. Packaging Adhesive Market by Beverage Application, 2025 (Millions USD) 439
Table 224. Packaging Adhesive Market by Non-Food Application, 2025 (Millions USD) 440
Table 225. Global Packaging Bioadhesive Market by End-Use and Technology, 2025–2036 (Millions USD) 442
Table 226. Lactips plastic pellets. 593
Table 227. Oji Holdings CNF products. 631
List of Figures
Figure 1. Global packaging market by material type. 37
Figure 2. Unilever’s Magnum ice cream tub using 100% chemically recycled PP . 38
Figure 3. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Materials, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 52
Figure 4. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Materials, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 54
Figure 5. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Product Type, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 56
Figure 6. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Packaging Product Type, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 58
Figure 7. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by End-Use Market, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 60
Figure 8. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by End-Use Market, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 62
Figure 9. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Region, 2023–2036 (1,000 tonnes) 64
Figure 10. Global Sustainable Packaging Market by Region, 2023–2036 (Millions USD) 66
Figure 11. Packaging lifecycle . 105
Figure 12. Routes for synthesizing polymers from fossil-based and bio-based resources. 117
Figure 13. Organization and morphology of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in different organisms. 143
Figure 14. Biosynthesis of (a) wood cellulose (b) tunicate cellulose and (c) BC. 144
Figure 15. Cellulose microfibrils and nanofibrils. 146
Figure 16. TEM image of cellulose nanocrystals. 147
Figure 17. CNC slurry. 147
Figure 18. CNF gel. 149
Figure 19. Bacterial nanocellulose shapes 156
Figure 20. BLOOM masterbatch from Algix. 162
Figure 21. Typical structure of mycelium-based foam. 164
Figure 22. Life cycle of biopolymer packaging materials. 185
Figure 23. Current management systems for waste plastics. 236
Figure 24. Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by technology, million metric tons. 243
Figure 25. Global demand by recycling process, 2020-2040, million metric tons. 244
Figure 26. Market map for advanced recycling. 246
Figure 27. Value chain for advanced plastics recycling market. 247
Figure 28. Schematic layout of a pyrolysis plant. 249
Figure 29. Waste plastic production pathways to (A) diesel and (B) gasoline 252
Figure 30. Schematic for Pyrolysis of Scrap Tires. 256
Figure 31. Used tires conversion process. 257
Figure 32. SWOT analysis-pyrolysis for advanced recycling. 258
Figure 33. Overview of biogas utilization. 263
Figure 34. Biogas and biomethane pathways. 264
Figure 35. SWOT analysis-gasification for advanced recycling. 265
Figure 36. SWOT analysis-dissoluton for advanced recycling. 268
Figure 37. Products obtained through the different solvolysis pathways of PET, PU, and PA. 270
Figure 38. SWOT analysis-Hydrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 273
Figure 39. SWOT analysis-Enzymolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 274
Figure 40. SWOT analysis-Methanolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 276
Figure 41. Mondelez confectionery packaging using chemically recycled PCR . 276
Figure 42. SWOT analysis-Glycolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 278
Figure 43. SWOT analysis-Aminolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 279
Figure 44. Kit Kat packaged in paper flow wrap. 295
Figure 45. Quality Street paper-based chocolate packaging. 297
Figure 46. Smarties paper-based chocolate packaging. 298
Figure 47. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes). 303
Figure 48. The Global Market for Sustainable Paper and Board Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 305
Figure 49. Types of bio-based materials used for antimicrobial food packaging application. 322
Figure 50. Water soluble packaging by Notpla. 326
Figure 51. Examples of edible films in food packaging. 327
Figure 52. The Global Market for Sustainable Food Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 330
Figure 53. mondi mono-material standup pouches 337
Figure 54. Rezorce mono-material PP carton lifecycle. 338
Figure 55. Haleon mono-material blister packaging development. 338
Figure 56. The Global Market for Sustainable Flexible Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (’000 tonnes) 351
Figure 57. The Global Market for Sustainable Flexible Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 353
Figure 58. The Global Market for Sustainable Rigid Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (’000 tonnes) 367
Figure 59. The Global Market for Sustainable Rigid Packaging by Material Type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD) 369
Figure 60. Applications for CO2. 370
Figure 61. Life cycle of CO2-derived products and services. 372
Figure 62. Conversion pathways for CO2-derived polymeric materials 373
Figure 63. Pluumo. 450
Figure 64. Anpoly cellulose nanofiber hydrogel. 461
Figure 65. MEDICELLU™. 461
Figure 66. Asahi Kasei CNF fabric sheet. 470
Figure 67. Properties of Asahi Kasei cellulose nanofiber nonwoven fabric. 471
Figure 68. CNF nonwoven fabric. 472
Figure 69. Passionfruit wrapped in Xgo Circular packaging. 477
Figure 70. Be Green Packaging molded fiber products. 479
Figure 71. Beyond Meat Molded Fiber Sausage Tray. 480
Figure 72. BIOLO e-commerce mailer bag made from PHA. 486
Figure 73. Reusable and recyclable foodservice cups, lids, and straws from Joinease Hong Kong Ltd., made with plant-based NuPlastiQ BioPolymer from BioLogiQ, Inc. 487
Figure 74. Fiber-based screw cap. 495
Figure 75. Molded fiber trays for contact lenses. 499
Figure 76. SEELCAP ONEGO. 502
Figure 77. CJ CheilJedang's biodegradable PHA-based wrapper for shipping products. 512
Figure 78. CuanSave film. 517
Figure 79. Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging beerGUARD molded fiber trays. 518
Figure 80. ELLEX products. 520
Figure 81. CNF-reinforced PP compounds. 521
Figure 82. Kirekira! toilet wipes. 521
Figure 83. Edible packaging from Dissolves. 525
Figure 84. Rheocrysta spray. 526
Figure 85. DKS CNF products. 526
Figure 86. Molded fiber plastic rings. 530
Figure 87. Mushroom leather. 539
Figure 88. Evoware edible seaweed-based packaging 545
Figure 89. Photograph (a) and micrograph (b) of mineral/ MFC composite showing the high viscosity and fibrillar structure. 546
Figure 90. Forest and Whale container. 554
Figure 91. PHA production process. 557
Figure 92. Soy Silvestre’s wheatgrass shots. 558
Figure 93. Genera molded fiber meat trays. 561
Figure 94. AVAPTM process. 564
Figure 95. GreenPower+™ process. 564
Figure 96. Cutlery samples (spoon, knife, fork) made of nano cellulose and biodegradable plastic composite materials. 570
Figure 97. CNF gel. 572
Figure 98. Block nanocellulose material. 573
Figure 99. CNF products developed by Hokuetsu. 573
Figure 100. Unilever Carte D’Or ice cream packaging. 576
Figure 101. Kami Shoji CNF products. 584
Figure 102. Matrix Pack molded-fiber beverage cup lid. 603
Figure 103. Molded fiber Labeling applied to products. 604
Figure 104. IPA synthesis method. 611
Figure 105. Compostable water pod. 626
Figure 106. Coca-cola paper bottle prototype. 637
Figure 107. Papierfabrik Meldorf’s grass-based packaging materials . 639
Figure 108. PulPac dry molded fiber packaging for cosmetics. 651
Figure 109. Example of Qwarzo grease barrier coating. 653
Figure 110. XCNF. 655
Figure 111: Innventia AB movable nanocellulose demo plant. 656
Figure 112. Molded fiber tray. 658
Figure 113. Shellworks packaging containers. 665
Figure 114. Thales packaging incorporating Fibrease. 675
Figure 115. Molded pulp bottles. 675
Figure 116. Sulapac cosmetics containers. 677
Figure 117. Sulzer equipment for PLA polymerization processing. 678
Figure 118. Molded fiber laundry detergent bottle. 682
Figure 119. Tanbark’s clamshell product. 683
Figure 120. Silver / CNF composite dispersions. 691
Figure 121. CNF/nanosilver powder. 691
Figure 122. Corbion FDCA production process. 693
Figure 123. UFP Technologies, Inc. product examples. 696
Figure 124. UPM biorefinery process. 698
Figure 125. Varden coffee pod. 701
Figure 126. Vegea production process. 702
Figure 127. Worn Again products. 705
Figure 128. npulp packaging. 706
Figure 129. Western Pulp Products corner protectors. 708
Figure 130. S-CNF in powder form. 710
常見問題
這份報告可以先索取樣本嗎？
可以。建議購買前先申請樣本，提出申請後約 2 個工作天內提供，您可以先確認內容涵蓋範圍是否符合需求。
報告價格如何計算？
報告以美元標價，台幣報價依當日匯率換算並加計 5% 營業稅。不同授權版本（單人／多人／企業全站）價格不同，量子訊息會評估您的使用情境後提供最優惠報價。
下單後多久交付？如何付款？
一般 3–7 個工作天交付，實際依出版商狀況於下單前確認。收到報告確認無誤後開立台幣發票，30 天內電匯付款即可。
量子訊息有限公司為 Future Markets 在台灣的授權代理，提供報告購買、樣本申請與授權諮詢。電話 +886 2 7751 5192 ・ 聯絡我們