報告摘要
The global green hydrogen market is navigating its most consequential transition since the sector's emergence: a structural shift from speculative ambition to selective commercial reality. After the investment surge of 2021–2022 and the brutal rationalisation of 2024–2025, the market in 2026 is defined by discipline rather than optimism — and by a sharp divergence between the applications and geographies that are genuinely working and those that have definitively failed.
Green hydrogen production crossed 1 million tonnes per year for the first time in 2025, up sixfold from 270,000 tonnes in 2021, with global installed electrolyser capacity surpassing 3 GW at mid-year. These are genuine milestones. But they sit alongside a 25% downward revision in the IEA's 2030 project pipeline (from 49 Mt to 37 Mt in a single year), a collapse of binding offtake agreements (only 1–5% of announced capacity), and manufacturer distress that has claimed Nikola Corporation (bankrupt, liquidated), Universal Hydrogen, Heliogen, and Green Hydrogen Systems, while placing Nel Hydrogen, Plug Power, McPhy Energy, and Fusion Fuel under severe financial pressure.
The policy environment has bifurcated catastrophically. The US eliminated the $3/kg Section 45V tax credit under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, effectively closing the American market — Nel's $400M Michigan gigafactory was permanently cancelled, Plug Power abandoned its Antwerp facility in August 2026, and Air Products wrote off $3.1 billion on its Massena plant. Europe simultaneously strengthened its approach: the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism became financially operational in January 2026, adding approximately €0.85–1.10/kg to grey hydrogen import costs, while the EU Hydrogen Bank's second auction cleared at a record-low subsidy bid of €0.37/kg. China continues state-directed deployment, controlling 65% of global installed electrolyser capacity.
Recent months have produced the sector's most important commercial confirmations. NEOM's 2.2 GW green ammonia complex completed construction in August 2026 — the world's first infrastructure-scale green hydrogen project. RWE's Lingen 300 MW project delivered Europe's first commercial green hydrogen through 120 kilometres of pipeline to Evonik's Marl chemical park. The Siemens Energy electrolyser business is being spun out as Omterra — creating the best-capitalised Western PEM manufacturer. Hive Hydrogen selected Topsoe's SOEC technology for the $5.8 billion Coega project in South Africa, the first GW-scale SOEC commercial commitment. And Ballard Power Systems acquired GeoPura for £275 million, confirming the commercial value of hydrogen-as-a-service models.
The path forward is selective but confirmed: refining and industrial hydrogen replacement under binding EU mandates, maritime ammonia under IMO 2027 framework compliance, green steel in premium-buyer markets, and AI/data centre fuel cells as an emerging creditworthy offtake category.
The Global Green Hydrogen Market 2027–2037 is a definitive 521-page industry analysis of the green hydrogen sector,. The report provides the most comprehensive current assessment of a market that has undergone structural rationalisation, with clear analysis of what has succeeded commercially and what has failed.
The report covers the full green hydrogen value chain — from production economics and electrolyser technology through storage and transport infrastructure to end-use applications in refining, ammonia, steel, maritime fuel, and emerging data centre power.
Report contents include:
Executive Summary — market overview, cancellation wave analysis, policy divergence (US collapse, EU mandates, China dominance), cost competitiveness, demand hierarchy, and 2027–2037 forecasts including application demand breakdown and infrastructure investment requirements
Introduction and Hydrogen Classification — colour taxonomy, global energy context, hydrogen economy overview, production methods, and the current vs. projected supply mix
Global Market Analysis — detailed sections on energy demand, cost competitiveness by region, industrial applications (refining, ammonia, steel, maritime, chemicals, aviation), electrolyser technology and manufacturing realities, carbon pricing mechanisms including full CBAM analysis, the offtake crisis quantification, technology maturity assessment, market map, global production data, demand forecasts to 2037, investment flow analysis, and market concentration
Green Hydrogen Projects Table — status of all major global projects updated to September 2026, including operational (NEOM, Lingen, Normand'Hy, Petrobrazi), under construction (Stegra), development stage (Coega, HNH Chile, Saemangeum), and cancelled (Air Products Louisiana, HyDeal Ambition, Nel Michigan)
Electrolyser Technologies — comprehensive technical and commercial chapters on alkaline water electrolysis, PEM electrolysis, AEM electrolysis (including Power to Hydrogen Antwerp milestone), SOEC (Coega/Topsoe selection), novel technologies (E-TAC, natural hydrogen, PCE), balance of plant costs, manufacturing capacities, and global market revenues
Hydrogen Storage and Transport — pipeline infrastructure, maritime shipping (ammonia vs. liquid hydrogen), compression and liquefaction, underground storage, and market players
Hydrogen Utilisation — fuel cells (PEMFC, SOFC), fuel cell vehicles (light-duty collapse, heavy-duty uncertain future), aviation, ammonia production and maritime fuel, e-methanol economics, green steel (H-DRI economics, Stegra proof-of-concept, regional development), power and heat generation, maritime propulsion technologies, fuel cell trains, and AI/data centre applications
Company Profiles — 170 companies across electrolyser manufacturers, project developers, industrial gas companies, storage and transport players, component suppliers, and end-use sector companies. Companies profiled include ABO Wind/ABO Energy, Adani Green Energy, Advanced Ionics, Aemetis Inc., Agfa-Gevaert NV, Air Products and Chemicals, Aker Horizons ASA, Alchemr Inc., Alleima, Alleo Energy, Arcadia eFuels, AREVA H2Gen, Asahi Kasei, Atmonia, Atome, Avantium, AvCarb, Avoxt B.V., BASF, Battolyser Systems, Blastr Green Steel, Bloom Energy, Boson Energy, BP, Brineworks, Caplyzer, Carbon280, Carbon Sink LLC, Cavendish Renewable Technology, CellMo, Ceres Power Holdings, Chevron Corporation, CHARBONE Hydrogen, Chiyoda Corporation, Cockerill Jingli Hydrogen, Convion, Cummins Inc., C-Zero, Cipher Neutron, De Nora, Dimensional Energy, Domsjö Fabriker AB, Dynelectro ApS, Elcogen AS, Electric Hydrogen, elementarhy, Elogen H2, Enapter, Energy B, ENEOS Corporation, Equatic and more
授權報價
| Single User | $1,100 GBP |
目錄 Table of Contents
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 26
1.1 Market Overview: A Sector in Transition 26
1.2 The Reality Check: Project Cancellations and Market Consolidation 26
1.3 Policy and Regulatory Landscape: Diverging Trajectories 27
1.3.1 United States 27
1.3.2 European Union 27
1.3.3 China 27
1.4 Market Economics: The Cost Competitiveness Challenge 28
1.5 Demand Picture: Industrial Applications Lead, New Markets Struggle 28
1.5.1 Strong Adoption - Existing Industrial Applications 28
1.5.2 Struggling Adoption - New Applications 28
1.6 Regional Market Dynamics: Import-Export Imbalances Emerging 29
1.7 Market Forecast 2027-2037 29
1.7.1 Market Size 29
1.7.2 Production Volume 29
1.7.3 Key Applications by 2037 (Demand Breakdown) 30
1.7.4 Infrastructure Investment Requirements (2025–2037) 32
1.8 Electrolyzer Technology and Manufacturing 33
1.8.1 Market structure (2026–2027) 33
1.8.2 Consolidation trajectory 34
1.8.3 AI integration delivering operational gains 34
1.9 Investment Outlook 34
1.10 Critical Challenges Facing the Sector 35
1.11 Outlook 37
2 INTRODUCTION 38
2.1 Hydrogen classification 38
2.1.1 Hydrogen colour shades 39
2.2 Global energy demand and consumption 39
2.3 The hydrogen economy and production 40
2.3.1 The Project Cancellation Wave (2024-2025) 43
2.4 Removing CO₂ emissions from hydrogen production 43
2.5 The Economics of Green Hydrogen 44
2.5.1 Cost Gaps and Market Imperatives 44
2.5.1.1 The Cost Competitiveness Challenge: Reality vs. Expectations 44
2.5.1.1.1 The Cost Reduction Disappointment — and Why It Differs by Market: 44
2.5.2 Hard-to-Abate Sectors 45
2.5.2.1 Market Reality: Industrial Replacement vs. New Applications 45
2.5.2.1.1 Where Green Hydrogen IS Working 46
2.5.2.1.2 Where Green Hydrogen IS NOT Working 46
2.5.3 Steel Production 46
2.5.3.1 Steel Sector Update 47
2.5.3.1.1 Projects Advancing 47
2.5.3.1.2 Projects Delayed or Restructured (2025–2026) 47
2.5.4 Ammonia Production 48
2.5.4.1 The Maritime Fuel Opportunity: Ammonia as Hydrogen Carrier 49
2.5.4.1.1 IMO Net-Zero Framework 49
2.5.4.1.2 Development Status 49
2.5.4.1.3 Fertiliser sector (parallel track) 50
2.5.4.1.4 2037 Projection 50
2.5.5 Chemical Industry and Refining 50
2.5.5.1 European Refiners: The Unexpected Green Hydrogen Leaders 51
2.5.6 Electrolyzer Technologies 52
2.5.6.1 2025–2026 Electrolyser Market Reality: Overcapacity, Consolidation, and Structural Reorganisation 52
2.5.6.1.1 Supply Chain Fragility 54
2.5.6.2 Alkaline Water Electrolyzers: Proven Technology Dominates Market 55
2.5.6.2.1 Why AWE dominates 55
2.5.6.2.2 Key limitations and current mitigation approaches 56
2.5.6.2.3 Innovation advancing AWE competitiveness 56
2.5.6.3 Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers: Superior Performance, Limited Adoption 57
2.5.6.3.1 The PEM Paradox 57
2.5.6.3.2 Why PEM Underperformed Market Expectations 57
2.5.6.3.3 Iridium bottleneck — 2026 breakthrough pending 58
2.5.6.3.4 PEM's genuine market position in 2025–2026 58
2.5.6.3.5 PEM's Niche Applications 59
2.5.6.4 Solid Oxide Electrolyzers: High Efficiency, High Risk, Distant Commercialization 60
2.5.6.4.1 Reality Check: SOEC Crosses a Commercial Threshold 60
2.5.6.4.2 Why Coega selected SOEC over AWE 60
2.5.6.4.3 Why Alkaline Won Over SOEC 62
2.5.6.4.4 The changing calculus post-2026 63
2.5.6.5 Next-Generation Technologies 63
2.5.6.5.1 Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers: Bridging the Gap — Crossed a Threshold in 2026 64
2.5.6.5.2 Novel Approaches: Beyond Conventional Electrolysis 65
2.5.6.5.3 Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Water Splitting 66
2.5.6.5.4 Medium-Temperature Steam Electrolysis (200–400°C) 67
2.5.6.5.5 Proton Ceramic Electrolysis (PCE) 67
2.5.6.5.6 Biological/Microbial Hydrogen Production 67
2.5.6.5.7 Plasma-Assisted Electrolysis 67
2.5.6.5.8 Market Reality 67
2.5.7 The Path Forward 68
2.5.7.1 The New Reality: What Changed 68
2.5.7.2 Implementation Pathways by Application 70
2.5.7.2.1 Near-Term Success Cases (2027-2030) 70
2.5.7.2.2 Medium-Term Opportunities (2030-2037) 71
2.5.7.2.3 Long-Term/Uncertain (Post-2037) 72
2.5.7.2.4 Failed Applications (Effectively Abandoned) 73
2.6 Hydrogen value chain 74
2.6.1 Production 75
2.6.1.1 Production Infrastructure Reality (2025-2026) 75
2.6.2 Transport and storage 77
2.6.2.1 Hydrogen Transport: The $80-120 Billion Infrastructure Gap 77
2.6.2.1.1 Current Transport Infrastructure 77
2.6.2.2 Infrastructure Investment Requirements (2025-2037) 79
2.6.2.3 Critical Challenges 79
2.6.2.4 Hydrogen Storage: Options and Costs 80
2.6.2.4.1 Storage Methods and Current Status 80
2.6.3 Utilization 81
2.6.3.1 Current Utilization by Sector 83
2.6.3.1.1 Existing Industrial Applications — Green H₂ Penetration Accelerating 83
2.7 National hydrogen initiatives, policy and regulation 85
2.7.1 Country focus: Canada 89
2.7.2 Country focus: Japan 90
2.8 Hydrogen certification 91
2.9 Carbon pricing 92
2.9.1 Overview 92
2.9.1.1 The Carbon Price Threshold for Green Hydrogen 92
2.9.2 Global Carbon Pricing Landscape 92
2.9.2.1 High Carbon Pricing — Driving Commercial Green H₂ Adoption 93
2.9.2.1.1 CBAM — Now Operational 93
2.9.2.2 Moderate Carbon Pricing (Insufficient for Green H2) 94
2.9.2.2.1 China National ETS 94
2.9.2.2.2 California Cap-and-Trade 95
2.9.2.2.3 Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) — Northeast USA 95
2.9.2.2.4 South Korea K-ETS 96
2.9.2.3 No/Minimal Carbon Pricing (Green H₂ Requires Full Subsidies or Mandate) 96
2.9.2.3.1 United States (Federal) 96
2.9.2.3.2 Canada 97
2.9.2.3.3 Australia 99
2.9.2.3.4 Middle East (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman) 99
2.9.2.3.5 Japan 100
2.9.2.3.6 South Korea 101
2.9.3 Carbon Pricing Mechanisms Comparison 101
2.9.4 The "Carbon Price + Mandate + Subsidy" Trinity 102
2.9.4.1 2025–2026 Lesson: All Three Required — The Policy Trinity Confirmed 102
2.9.5 Carbon Pricing Projections and Green Hydrogen Implications 104
2.9.5.1 Global Carbon Price Scenarios 105
2.9.6 Carbon Pricing Alternatives and Supplements 106
2.10 Market challenges 109
2.10.1 The Offtake Crisis (Most Critical Challenge) 112
2.10.2 The Infrastructure Chicken-and-Egg 114
2.10.3 Cost Competitiveness - The Persistent Gap 114
2.10.4 Technology Maturity Gap 115
2.11 Industry developments 2020-2026 117
2.12 Market map 132
2.13 Global hydrogen production 134
2.13.1 Industrial applications 135
2.13.2 Hydrogen energy 135
2.13.2.1 Stationary use 135
2.13.2.2 Hydrogen for mobility 136
2.13.3 Current Annual H2 Production 137
2.13.3.1 Global Hydrogen Production: Reality vs. Ambition 137
2.13.3.2 Regional Production Patterns and Methods 137
2.13.4 Leading Green Hydrogen Projects and Operational Status 138
2.13.5 The Project Cancellation Wave 141
2.13.6 Hydrogen production processes 143
2.13.6.1 Regional Variation in Production Methods 145
2.13.6.2 The Capacity Deployment Gap 146
2.13.6.3 Production Cost Drivers by Technology 147
2.13.6.4 Geographic Cost Competitiveness 147
2.13.6.5 Hydrogen as by-product 148
2.13.6.6 Reforming 149
2.13.6.6.1 SMR wet method 149
2.13.6.6.2 Oxidation of petroleum fractions 149
2.13.6.6.3 Coal gasification 149
2.13.6.7 Reforming or coal gasification with CO2 capture and storage 149
2.13.6.8 Steam reforming of biomethane 150
2.13.6.9 Water electrolysis 151
2.13.6.10 The "Power-to-Gas" concept 152
2.13.6.11 Fuel cell stack 153
2.13.6.12 Electrolysers 154
2.13.6.13 Other 155
2.13.6.13.1 Plasma technologies 155
2.13.6.13.2 Photosynthesis 156
2.13.6.13.3 Bacterial or biological processes 156
2.13.6.13.4 Oxidation (biomimicry) 157
2.13.7 Production costs 158
2.14 Global hydrogen demand forecasts 159
2.14.1 Green and Blue Hydrogen Penetration 160
2.14.2 Demand by End-Use Application 161
2.14.3 Green Hydrogen Demand by Application 163
2.14.4 Regional Demand Patterns 164
2.14.5 Import-Export Dynamics and Trade Flows 165
2.14.6 Demand Growth Drivers and Constraints 166
2.14.7 Market Size and Revenue Forecasts: Recalibrating the Hydrogen Economy 168
2.14.7.1 Total Hydrogen Market Revenue 168
2.14.7.2 Electrolyzer Equipment Market 169
2.14.7.3 Infrastructure Investment Requirements 171
2.14.7.4 Green Hydrogen Market Revenue by Application 172
2.14.7.5 Investment Flow Analysis 172
2.14.7.6 Geographic Distribution of Investment 173
2.14.8 Market Concentration and Competitive Dynamics 174
3 GREEN HYDROGEN PRODUCTION 177
3.1 Overview 177
3.2 Green hydrogen projects 177
3.3 Motivation for use 180
3.4 Decarbonization 181
3.5 Comparative analysis 182
3.6 Role in energy transition 182
3.7 Renewable energy sources 183
3.7.1 Wind power 183
3.7.2 Solar Power 184
3.7.3 Nuclear 184
3.7.4 Capacities 184
3.7.5 Costs 184
3.8 SWOT analysis 185
4 ELECTROLYZER TECHNOLOGIES 187
4.1 Introduction 187
4.1.1 Technical Specifications and Performance Evolution 187
4.1.2 Chinese Manufacturing Leadership 189
4.1.3 Architecture and Design Evolution 193
4.1.4 Cost Structure and Economic Competitiveness 194
4.1.5 Future Outlook and Development Trajectory 195
4.1.6 Market Share Projections 195
4.2 Main types 198
4.3 Technology Selection Decision Factors 198
4.4 Balance of Plant 199
4.4.1 Components, Costs, and Commercial Significance 201
4.4.2 Power Electronics: The Largest Single BoP Cost 202
4.4.3 Water Treatment 202
4.4.4 Gas Purification and Compression 203
4.4.5 Thermal Management 203
4.4.6 AI Integration in BoP Operations (2025–2026) 203
4.5 Characteristics 204
4.6 Advantages and disadvantages 206
4.7 Electrolyzer market 206
4.7.1 Market trends 206
4.7.2 Market landscape 209
4.7.2.1 Market Structure Evolution 209
4.7.2.1.1 2026 Status — Three Confirmed Tiers 209
4.7.3 Innovations 211
4.7.4 Cost challenges 212
4.7.5 Why Electrolyzers Differ from Solar/Batteries 212
4.7.6 Scale-up 214
4.7.7 Manufacturing challenges 215
4.7.8 Market opportunity and outlook 216
4.7.8.1 The data center upside — the most significant new demand variable 218
4.8 Alkaline water electrolyzers (AWE) 219
4.8.1 Technology description 219
4.8.2 AWE plant 220
4.8.3 Components and materials 221
4.8.4 Costs 222
4.8.5 Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) from AWE 223
4.8.6 Companies 225
4.9 Anion exchange membrane electrolyzers (AEMEL) 228
4.9.1 Technology description 228
4.9.2 Technical Specifications - Lab vs. Demonstration vs. Target 228
4.9.3 AEMEL plant 229
4.9.4 Components and materials 231
4.9.4.1 Catalysts 232
4.9.4.2 Anion exchange membranes (AEMs) 232
4.9.4.3 Materials 233
4.9.5 Costs 235
4.9.5.1 Current Cost Structure 235
4.9.5.2 Performance and Cost Positioning 236
4.9.5.3 Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) from AMEL 237
4.9.5.4 Cost Reduction Pathways 237
4.9.6 Companies 238
4.10 Proton exchange membrane electrolyzers (PEMEL) 240
4.10.1 Technology description 240
4.10.2 The Iridium Bottleneck 241
4.10.2.1 Ultra-Low Iridium Technology Advancing 243
4.10.3 PEMEL plant 243
4.10.4 Components and materials 244
4.10.4.1 Membranes 245
4.10.4.2 Advanced PEMEL stack designs 245
4.10.4.3 Plug-and-Play & Customizable PEMEL Systems 246
4.10.4.4 PEMELs and proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) 247
4.10.5 Costs 248
4.10.5.1 Current Cost Structure 248
4.10.5.2 Cost Reduction Pathways 249
4.10.6 Companies 250
4.11 Solid oxide water electrolyzers (SOEC) 253
4.11.1 Technology description 253
4.11.2 Technical Performance - Theoretical vs. Demonstrated Reality 254
4.11.3 Why SOEC Cannot Compete - Economic Reality 255
4.11.4 SOEC plant 256
4.11.5 Components and materials 257
4.11.5.1 External process heat 258
4.11.5.2 Clean Syngas Production 258
4.11.5.3 Nuclear power 259
4.11.5.4 SOEC and SOFC cells 259
4.11.5.4.1 Tubular cells 259
4.11.5.4.2 Planar cells 260
4.11.5.5 SOEC Electrolyte 260
4.11.6 Costs 261
4.11.6.1 Current Cost Structure 261
4.11.6.2 Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) from SOEC 262
4.11.7 Companies 264
4.12 Other electrolyzer types 267
4.12.1 Overview 267
4.12.2 CO₂ electrolysis 268
4.12.2.1 Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction 269
4.12.2.2 Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Catalysts 270
4.12.2.3 Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Technologies 270
4.12.2.4 Low-Temperature Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction 271
4.12.2.5 High-Temperature Solid Oxide Electrolyzers 272
4.12.2.6 Cost 273
4.12.2.7 Challenges 273
4.12.2.8 Coupling H₂ and Electrochemical CO₂ 274
4.12.2.9 Products 275
4.12.3 Seawater electrolysis 275
4.12.3.1 Direct Seawater vs Brine (Chlor-Alkali) Electrolysis 276
4.12.3.2 Key Challenges & Limitations 276
4.12.4 Protonic Ceramic Electrolyzers (PCE) 278
4.12.5 Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MEC) 279
4.12.6 Photoelectrochemical Cells (PEC) 280
4.12.7 E-TAC Electrolysis (Electrochemical-Thermally Activated Chemical) 281
4.12.8 Companies 282
4.13 Costs 282
4.14 Water and land use for green hydrogen production 283
4.14.1 Water Consumption Reality 284
4.14.2 Land Requirements Reality 285
4.15 Electrolyzer manufacturing capacities 285
4.16 Global Market Revenues 287
5 HYDROGEN STORAGE AND TRANSPORT 290
5.1 Market overview 290
5.2 Hydrogen transport methods 291
5.2.1 Pipeline transportation 293
5.2.1.1 Current Infrastructure Reality 293
5.2.1.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Repurposing - The Failed Promise 293
5.2.1.3 Pipeline Economics and Project Viability 294
5.2.2 Road or rail transport 295
5.2.3 Maritime transportation 295
5.2.3.1 Ammonia vs. Liquid Hydrogen Shipping - The Decisive Battle 296
5.2.3.2 Ammonia Shipping Infrastructure Requirements 296
5.2.3.3 Ammonia Cracking - The Critical Bottleneck 297
5.2.4 On-board-vehicle transport 297
5.3 Hydrogen compression, liquefaction, storage 298
5.3.1 Storage Technology Overview and Economics 298
5.3.2 Solid storage 299
5.3.3 Liquid storage on support 299
5.3.4 Underground storage 300
5.3.4.1 Salt Cavern Storage - Detailed Assessment 300
5.3.4.2 Alternative Underground Storage Options 301
5.3.5 Subsea Hydrogen Storage 301
5.4 Market players 302
6 HYDROGEN UTILIZATION 306
6.1 Hydrogen Fuel Cells 306
6.1.1 Market overview 306
6.1.2 Critical Market Failure - Light-Duty Vehicles 307
6.1.3 Why FCEVs failed 307
6.1.4 PEM fuel cells (PEMFCs) 308
6.1.4.1 2026 market development: Data centre/AI power demand 308
6.1.5 Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) 309
6.1.6 Alternative fuel cells 310
6.2 Alternative fuel production 310
6.2.1 Solid Biofuels 311
6.2.2 Liquid Biofuels 311
6.2.3 Gaseous Biofuels 312
6.2.4 Conventional Biofuels 312
6.2.5 Advanced Biofuels 312
6.2.6 Feedstocks 313
6.2.7 Production of biodiesel and other biofuels 314
6.2.8 Renewable diesel 315
6.2.9 Biojet and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) 316
6.2.10 Electrofuels (E-fuels, power-to-gas/liquids/fuels) 318
6.2.10.1 Hydrogen electrolysis 322
6.2.10.2 eFuel production facilities, current and planned 324
6.3 Hydrogen Vehicles 328
6.3.1 Market overview 328
6.3.2 Light-Duty FCEV Market Collapse 329
6.3.3 Manufacturer Exits and Remaining Players 330
6.3.4 Refueling Infrastructure Collapse 331
6.3.5 Heavy-Duty Hydrogen Trucks - Uncertain Future 332
6.3.6 Heavy-duty FCEV market outlook 334
6.4 Aviation 334
6.4.1 Market overview 334
6.5 Ammonia production 334
6.5.1 Market overview 334
6.5.2 Current Market Structure 337
6.5.3 Drivers of Green Ammonia Adoption 337
6.5.4 Maritime Fuel - The Game Changer 339
6.5.5 Ammonia vs. methanol for maritime 339
6.5.6 Decarbonisation of ammonia production 340
6.5.7 Green ammonia synthesis methods 341
6.5.7.1 Haber-Bosch process 341
6.5.7.2 Biological nitrogen fixation 342
6.5.7.3 Electrochemical production 342
6.5.7.4 Chemical looping processes 342
6.5.8 Green Ammonia Production Costs 342
6.5.9 Blue ammonia 344
6.5.9.1 Blue ammonia projects 344
6.5.10 Chemical energy storage 345
6.5.10.1 Ammonia fuel cells 345
6.5.10.2 Marine fuel 346
6.6 Methanol production 349
6.6.1 Market overview 349
6.6.1.1 Current Market Structure 349
6.6.2 E-Methanol Economics 350
6.6.3 Maritime methanol vs. ammonia competition 351
6.6.4 Maritime Methanol vs. Ammonia Competition: 352
6.6.5 Methanol-to gasoline technology 352
6.6.5.1 Production processes 353
6.6.5.1.1 Anaerobic digestion 354
6.6.5.1.2 Biomass gasification 354
6.6.5.1.3 Power to Methane 355
6.7 Steelmaking 356
6.7.1 Market overview 356
6.7.2 Current Steel Production Methods 357
6.7.2.1 H-DRI process 357
6.7.2.2 H-DRI Process Overview 358
6.7.3 Green Steel Production Costs and Economics 358
6.7.4 Regional Green Steel Development 359
6.7.5 Comparative analysis 361
6.7.5.1 BF-BOF vs. H-DRI + EAF - Comprehensive Comparison 361
6.7.6 Hydrogen Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) 362
6.7.7 Green Steel Market Demand and Willingness-to-Pay 363
6.8 Power & heat generation 365
6.8.1 Market overview 365
6.8.1.1 Why Hydrogen Failed in Power Sector 365
6.8.2 Power generation 365
6.8.3 Economics of Hydrogen Power 366
6.8.4 Heat Generation 366
6.8.4.1 Building Heating with Hydrogen - Failed Application 367
6.9 Maritime 368
6.9.1 Market overview 368
6.9.2 IMO Regulatory Framework - The Demand Driver 369
6.9.3 Ammonia vs. Methanol for Maritime - Technology Competition 370
6.9.4 Maritime Ammonia Infrastructure Requirements 371
6.9.5 Critical bottleneck 372
6.9.6 Ammonia Marine Engines and Fuel Cells 372
6.9.6.1 MAN Energy Solutions 373
6.9.6.2 Viking Energy ShipFC project (Norway) 373
6.9.6.3 Toxicity management — the primary technical challenge 373
6.10 Fuel cell trains 374
6.10.1 Market overview 374
6.11 AI and Data Centers 375
7 COMPANY PROFILES 377 (170 company profiles)
8 APPENDIX 513
8.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 513
9 REFERENCES 515
圖表清單 List of Tables & Figures
List of Tables
Table 1. Green hydrogen demand 2027-2037. 32
Table 2. Infrastructure Investment Requirements (2025–2037) 32
Table 3. Electrolyzer Technology System prices (2026 benchmarks and trajectory to 2037): 33
Table 4. Hydrogen colour shades, Technology, cost, and CO2 emissions. 39
Table 5. Current and projected hydrogen demand by application (2025, 2030, 2037) 41
Table 6. Overview of hydrogen production methods. 42
Table 7. Current Cost Reality (2025–2026) 44
Table 8. 2025–2026 Installation Cost Breakdown (non-China) 45
Table 9. Economic reality Green Steel 48
Table 10. Cost trajectory (ammonia maritime fuel, 2025–2037) 50
Table 11. Cost Competitiveness Timeline 52
Table 12. Electrolyzer Manufacturing Overcapacity (2025–2026) 52
Table 13. Electrolyzer Manufacturer viability assessment 53
Table 14. Current commercial specifications (2025–2026) Alkaline Water Electrolyzers 55
Table 15. AWE cost trajectory 56
Table 16. PEM technology specifications (confirmed commercial systems) 58
Table 17. PEM Cost trajectory revised (2026–2037) 58
Table 18. Major PEM projects operational or under construction (2025–2026) 59
Table 19. SOEC technology specifications (2026 commercial and demonstration systems) 61
Table 20. The economic case against SOEC through 2026 62
Table 21. AEM electrolysers 2025–2026 status 64
Table 22. AEM timeline 65
Table 23. Production Cost Reality by Region (2025–2026, updated) 76
Table 24. Pipelines — the cheapest large-scale transport option 77
Table 25. Maritime Shipping — ammonia confirmed, liquid hydrogen niche 78
Table 26. Transport cost comparison (2025–2026) 78
Table 27. Infrastructure Investment Requirements 79
Table 28. Hydrogen Storage Methods 80
Table 29. Utilisation summary table (2025–2037): 85
Table 30. National Hydrogen Strategy Assessment 86
Table 31. Carbon price required for green H₂ to reach cost parity with grey (no other support) 92
Table 32. European Union ETS 93
Table 33. Carbon Pricing Systems and Green Hydrogen Impact 101
Table 34. Policy model comparison 103
Table 35. EU Carbon Pricing Trajectory and Green Hydrogen Gap Closure (Updated, Extended to 2037) 104
Table 36. Realistic Scenario (Current Policies Maintained — Base Case, 50–60% probability) 105
Table 37. Market challenges in the hydrogen economy and production technologies. 109
Table 38. Challenge Resolution Pathways and Requirements 110
Table 39. Market Challenges by Stakeholder Impact 111
Table 40. Challenge Severity by Application Sector 111
Table 41. Regional offtake security comparison 113
Table 42. Solutions working vs. failing 113
Table 43. Investment Required vs. Committed 114
Table 44. Cost Gap Evolution and Projections 114
Table 45. Technology Readiness vs. Market Requirements (Updated September 2026) 115
Table 46. Green hydrogen industry developments 2020-2026. 117
Table 47. Market map for hydrogen technology and production. 132
Table 48. Global Hydrogen Production Overview 134
Table 49. Industrial applications of hydrogen. 135
Table 50. Hydrogen energy markets and applications. 136
Table 51. Global Hydrogen Production Overview 137
Table 52. Global Hydrogen Production by Method and Region 138
Table 53. Green Hydrogen Production Capacity - Top Projects 139
Table 54. Cancelled Major Green Hydrogen Projects 142
Table 55. Hydrogen production processes and stage of development. 143
Table 56. Hydrogen Production Methods - Technical and Economic Comparison (2024) 145
Table 57. Regional Production Method Mix (2024) 145
Table 58. Electrolyzer Capacity - Installed vs. Under Construction vs. Announced 146
Table 59. Production Cost Drivers by Method (2024) 147
Table 60. Green Hydrogen Production Cost by Region (2025–2026) 147
Table 61. Comprehensive Production Cost Comparison (2025 actuals vs. 2030 and 2037 projections) 158
Table 62. Total Hydrogen Demand Projections — All Production Methods (2025–2037) 160
Table 63. Low-Emissions Hydrogen (Green + Blue) Demand and Market Share (2025–2037) 160
Table 64. Hydrogen Demand by End-Use Application (2025 actuals vs. 2030 / 2033 / 2037 projections) 161
Table 65. Green Hydrogen Demand by Application (2025, 2030, 2033, 2037) 163
Table 66. Regional Hydrogen Demand Projections (2025, 2030, 2036, 2037) 164
Table 67. Major Import-Export Trade Flows (2033 and 2037 Projections) 165
Table 68. Infrastructure requirements 166
Table 69. Demand Drivers vs. Constraints (Relative Impact Assessment) 167
Table 70. Total Hydrogen Market Revenue by Production Method (2025–2037) 169
Table 71. Electrolyser Equipment Market Revenue and Capacity Deployment (2025–2037) 169
Table 72. Cumulative Infrastructure Investment Requirements (2025–2037) 171
Table 73. Green Hydrogen Market Revenue by Application (2025–2037, US$B) 172
Table 74. Annual Investment Flow Analysis (2025–2037) 172
Table 75. Investment Distribution by Geography (% of total, 2025–2037) 173
Table 76. Electrolyser Manufacturing — Rapid Consolidation 174
Table 77. Project developer concentration 175
Table 78. Green hydrogen application markets. 177
Table 79. Major Green Hydrogen Projects — Global Status (September 2026) 177
Table 80. Green Hydrogen 2026 Market Status Update 180
Table 81. Traditional Hydrogen Production. 180
Table 82. Hydrogen Production Processes. 181
Table 83. Comparison of hydrogen types. 182
Table 84. Alkaline Electrolyser Performance Evolution (2020 → 2025 → 2030 → 2037) 188
Table 85. Comparative performance update (2026 commercial systems) 189
Table 86. Leading Electrolyser Manufacturers — Global Competitive Landscape (September 2026) 189
Table 87. Global manufacturing capacity summary 192
Table 88. Electrolyser Capacity — Installed vs. Under Construction vs. Announced 192
Table 89. US DOE Technical Targets vs. Current Performance by Electrolyser Technology (2025 actuals vs. DOE 2026 targets) 193
Table 90. Alkaline Electrolyzer Architecture Comparison 194
Table 91. Alkaline Electrolyzer Cost Breakdown (2024 vs. 2036 Projection) 194
Table 92. Alkaline Technology Roadmap 195
Table 93. Alkaline Market Share Evolution by Application 196
Table 94. Electrolyser Manufacturing Capacity by Company 196
Table 95. Electrolyzer Technology Comparison - Technical and Commercial Status (2024) 198
Table 96. Technology Selection by Application Type (2024-2025 Market Patterns) 199
Table 97. BoP Cost Breakdown by Component (% of Total Installed System Cost, 2025–2026) 201
Table 98. Characteristics of typical water electrolysis technologies 205
Table 99. Advantages and disadvantages of water electrolysis technologies. 206
Table 100. Global Electrolyser Market Evolution (2020–2025 Actual, 2026–2037 Projections) 208
Table 101. Manufacturer Viability Assessment 210
Table 102. Cost Reality vs. Projections Table (2022 Forecast → 2025 Actual → 2030 and 2037 Revised) 213
Table 103. Manufacturing gigafactory status 214
Table 104. Market Opportunity Scenarios (2025–2037 Cumulative) 216
Table 105. Regional deployment outlook (2025–2037 cumulative, base case): 217
Table 106. Cumulative electrolyser revenue decomposition (2025–2037, base case) 218
Table 107. Classifications of Alkaline Electrolyzers. 219
Table 108. Advantages & limitations of AWE. 219
Table 109. Key performance characteristics of AWE. 220
Table 110. Updated cost trajectory (2025–2037) 222
Table 111. AWE LCOH by Region (2025–2026 Actual, 2030 and 2037 Projections) 223
Table 112. LCOH component breakdown 224
Table 113. Detailed AWE System Cost Breakdown - Chinese vs. Western Manufacturers 225
Table 114. Major AWE Manufacturers 227
Table 115. AEM Performance - Laboratory vs. Demonstration vs. Commercial Targets 228
Table 116. Updated AEM commercial timeline (revised September 2026) 230
Table 117. Updated AEM cost benchmarks (2026): 231
Table 118. Comparison of Commercial AEM Materials. 234
Table 119. AEM Electrolyser Cost Structure — Current (2025–2026) vs. Projected Commercial (2030–2037) 235
Table 120. Performance vs. competitive technologies 236
Table 121. AEM Competitive Positioning vs. Established Technologies 236
Table 122. Companies in the AMEL market. 238
Table 123. Iridium Supply Constraint vs. PEM Electrolyzer Scaling Requirements 241
Table 124. Revised iridium cost trajectory 243
Table 125. PEM Electrolyser Cost Breakdown — 2025–2026 Actual vs. 2030 and 2037 Projections 248
Table 126. PEM Cost Reduction Pathways - Feasibility and Impact Assessment 249
Table 127. Companies in the PEMEL market. 251
Table 128. SOEC Performance - Theoretical vs. Pilot Demonstration vs. Commercial Requirements 254
Table 129. LCOH Comparison - SOEC vs. Alkaline in Best-Case SOEC Applications 255
Table 130. SOEC System Cost Breakdown — 2025–2026 Actual vs. 2032–2037 Projections 261
Table 131. SOEC LCOH 262
Table 132. SOEC LCOH Scenarios - Best Case to Worst Case 262
Table 133. Why SOEC Failed - Summary Assessment: 263
Table 134. Companies in the SOEC market. 264
Table 135. Other types of electrolyzer technologies 267
Table 136. Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Technologies/ 270
Table 137. Cost Comparison of CO₂ Electrochemical Technologies. 273
Table 138. Direct Seawater vs. Desalinated Water Electrolysis Comparison 278
Table 139. PEC vs. PV+Electrolysis Pathway Comparison 280
Table 140. Companies developing other electrolyzer technologies. 282
Table 141. Electrolyser Technology Cost Comparison — All Technologies (2026 Actual vs. 2030 and 2037 Projections) 282
Table 142. Water Requirements for Green Hydrogen Production 284
Table 143. Land Footprint for Green Hydrogen Production (Renewable Energy + Electrolyzer) 285
Table 144. Global Electrolyser Manufacturing Capacity — Current (2026) vs. Projected (2030, 2033, 2037) 285
Table 145. Key manufacturing developments 2025–2026 286
Table 146. Global Electrolyser Equipment Market Size — 2018 to 2037 (US$ Billions) 287
Table 147. Revenue by technology (2025–2037 cumulative, base case): 289
Table 148. Hydrogen Infrastructure Investment Requirements vs. Commitments (2024-2036) 290
Table 149. Hydrogen Transport Methods - Comprehensive Comparison 292
Table 150. Existing and Planned Hydrogen Pipeline Infrastructure (2024-2036) 293
Table 151. Natural Gas Pipeline Repurposing Challenges and Reality 293
Table 152. Hydrogen Pipeline Economics - Representative 500 km Regional Project 294
Table 153. Road/Rail Transport Economics 295
Table 154. Ammonia vs. Liquid H2 Shipping - Comprehensive Comparison 296
Table 155. Ammonia Shipping Value Chain - Investment and Development Status (2024-2036) 296
Table 156. Ammonia Cracking Facility Economics 297
Table 157. Hydrogen Storage Technologies - Comprehensive Comparison (2024) 298
Table 158. Salt Cavern Hydrogen Storage Economics and Availability 300
Table 159. Regional Salt Cavern Storage Availability and Implications 300
Table 160. Depleted Gas Fields and Aquifers - Uncertain Potential 301
Table 161. Industrial Gas Companies — Infrastructure Positions (Updated September 2026) 302
Table 162. Pipeline Infrastructure Developers 303
Table 163. Ammonia Shipping, Bunkering and Terminals 304
Table 164. Storage Technology Providers 304
Table 165. Hydrogen Refuelling Infrastructure 305
Table 166. PEMFC market segmentation 308
Table 167. Categories and examples of solid biofuel. 311
Table 168. Comparison of biofuels and e-fuels to fossil and electricity. 312
Table 169. Classification of biomass feedstock. 313
Table 170. Biorefinery feedstocks. 314
Table 171. Feedstock conversion pathways. 314
Table 172. Biodiesel production techniques. 315
Table 173. Advantages and disadvantages of biojet fuel 316
Table 174. Production pathways for bio-jet fuel. 317
Table 175. Applications of e-fuels, by type. 320
Table 176. Overview of e-fuels. 321
Table 177. Benefits of e-fuels. 321
Table 178. eFuel production facilities, current and planned. 324
Table 179. FCEV vs. BEV Competitive Position 329
Table 180. FCEV Manufacturer Status 330
Table 181. Hydrogen Refuelling Station Status by Region 331
Table 182. Heavy-duty truck competition 333
Table 183. Manufacturer status 333
Table 184. Global ammonia production by region and source 337
Table 185. Green Ammonia Demand Drivers and Market Segments (2025–2037) 337
Table 186. Maritime ammonia development timeline 339
Table 187. Green Ammonia Production Cost by Region (2025–2026 Actual vs. 2030 and 2037 Projections) 343
Table 188. Cost breakdown (representative: MENA, 2025–2026) 343
Table 189. Blue ammonia projects. 344
Table 190. Ammonia fuel cell technologies. 345
Table 191. Market overview of green ammonia in marine fuel. 346
Table 192. Summary of marine alternative fuels. 347
Table 193. Estimated costs for different types of ammonia. 348
Table 194. Global methanol market (2025–2026) 349
Table 195. E-methanol applications 350
Table 196. E-Methanol Production Costs (2025–2026 Actual vs. 2030 and 2037 Projections) 350
Table 197. Cost breakdown (representative: MENA, 2025–2026) 351
Table 198. Maritime methanol vs. ammonia 351
Table 199. Maritime Fuel Competition - Methanol vs. Ammonia 352
Table 200. Comparison of biogas, biomethane and natural gas. 354
Table 201. Global Steel Production by Method and Decarbonization Potential 357
Table 202. Steel Production Cost Comparison — BF-BOF vs. H-DRI + EAF 358
Table 203. Green Steel Projects and Capacity by Region 359
Table 204. Leading green steel projects 360
Table 205. Steelmaking Technology Comparison 361
Table 206. H-DRI Process Parameters and Requirements 363
Table 207. Green Steel Customer Segments and Premium Acceptance 363
Table 208. Green steel demand projections 364
Table 209. Hydrogen vs. Competing Technologies for Power Generation 365
Table 210. Hydrogen Power Generation Technologies 365
Table 211. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) - Hydrogen vs. Alternatives 366
Table 212. Heating Technology Comparison - Hydrogen vs. Alternatives 367
Table 213. Maritime Fuel Consumption and Decarbonization Pathways 369
Table 214. IMO GHG Regulations and Impact 369
Table 215. Ammonia vs. Methanol - Detailed Maritime Fuel Comparison 370
Table 216. Maritime Ammonia Value Chain Investment Needs 371
Table 217. Ammonia Propulsion Technologies for Maritime 372
Table 218. Rail Electrification Alternatives - Hydrogen vs. Competition 375
Table 219. Hydrogen Train Projects 375
List of Figures
Figure 1. Hydrogen value chain. 82
Figure 2. Principle of a PEM electrolyser. 151
Figure 3. Power-to-gas concept. 153
Figure 4. Schematic of a fuel cell stack. 154
Figure 5. High pressure electrolyser - 1 MW. 155
Figure 6. SWOT analysis: green hydrogen. 186
Figure 7. Types of electrolysis technologies. 187
Figure 8. Typical Balance of Plant including Gas processing. 200
Figure 9. Schematic of alkaline water electrolysis working principle. 220
Figure 10. Alkaline water electrolyzer. 221
Figure 11. Typical system design and balance of plant for an AEM electrolyser. 230
Figure 12. Schematic of PEM water electrolysis working principle. 242
Figure 13. Typical system design and balance of plant for a PEM electrolyser. 244
Figure 14. Schematic of solid oxide water electrolysis working principle. 253
Figure 15. Typical system design and balance of plant for a solid oxide electrolyser. 257
Figure 16. Process steps in the production of electrofuels. 319
Figure 17. Mapping storage technologies according to performance characteristics. 320
Figure 18. Production process for green hydrogen. 322
Figure 19. E-liquids production routes. 323
Figure 20. Fischer-Tropsch liquid e-fuel products. 323
Figure 21. Resources required for liquid e-fuel production. 324
Figure 22. Levelized cost and fuel-switching CO2 prices of e-fuels. 326
Figure 23. Cost breakdown for e-fuels. 328
Figure 24. Hydrogen fuel cell powered EV. 329
Figure 25. Green ammonia production and use. 336
Figure 26. Classification and process technology according to carbon emission in ammonia production. 340
Figure 27. Schematic of the Haber Bosch ammonia synthesis reaction. 341
Figure 28. Schematic of hydrogen production via steam methane reformation. 342
Figure 29. Estimated production cost of green ammonia. 349
Figure 30. Renewable Methanol Production Processes from Different Feedstocks. 353
Figure 31. Production of biomethane through anaerobic digestion and upgrading. 354
Figure 32. Production of biomethane through biomass gasification and methanation. 355
Figure 33. Production of biomethane through the Power to methane process. 355
Figure 34. Transition to hydrogen-based production. 356
Figure 35. Hydrogen Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) process. 362
Figure 36. Three Gorges Hydrogen Boat No. 1. 369
Figure 37. PESA hydrogen-powered shunting locomotive. 374
Figure 38. Symbiotic™ technology process. 378
Figure 39. Alchemr AEM electrolyzer cell. 383
Figure 40. Domsjö process. 412
Figure 41. EL 2.1 AEM Electrolyser. 416
Figure 42. Enapter – Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM) Water Electrolysis. 417
Figure 43. Direct MCH® process. 419
Figure 44. FuelPositive system. 425
Figure 45. Left: a typical single-stage electrolyzer design, with a membrane separating the hydrogen and oxygen gasses. Right: the two-stage E-TAC process. 442
Figure 46. Hystar PEM electrolyser. 453
Figure 47. OCOchem’s Carbon Flux Electrolyzer. 472
Figure 48. CO2 hydrogenation to jet fuel range hydrocarbons process. 476
Figure 49. The Plagazi ® process. 481
Figure 50. Sunfire process for Blue Crude production. 498
Figure 51. O12 Reactor. 509
Figure 52. Sunglasses with lenses made from CO2-derived materials. 509
Figure 53. CO2 made car part. 509
提及公司
常見問題
這份報告可以先索取樣本嗎？
可以。建議購買前先申請樣本，提出申請後約 2 個工作天內提供，您可以先確認內容涵蓋範圍是否符合需求。
報告價格如何計算？
報告以美元標價，台幣報價依當日匯率換算並加計 5% 營業稅。不同授權版本（單人／多人／企業全站）價格不同，量子訊息會評估您的使用情境後提供最優惠報價。
下單後多久交付？如何付款？
一般 3–7 個工作天交付，實際依出版商狀況於下單前確認。收到報告確認無誤後開立台幣發票，30 天內電匯付款即可。
量子訊息有限公司為 Future Markets 在台灣的授權代理，提供報告購買、樣本申請與授權諮詢。電話 +886 2 7751 5192 ・ 聯絡我們